this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
602 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

88348 readers
3585 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've always believed that the reason executives were so confident in AI is because they saw how effective it was at replacing their own work. It's not even much different from just doing whatever Gartner says or their competition is doing.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That is the thing though, they don't have any actual work. In theory, they simply ingest data and spit out logical decisions based on that data. In reality, the data has been so selectively filtered and manipulated at every layer of management on the way up that it becomes functionally meaningless. Executives are so bad at making the right decisions that their subordinates actively hide what's really happening from them.

Further, executives serve no useful function beyond tricking employees into feeling like they matter and the company cares about them. This is why they have hour long all-hands meetings where they communicate no useful information but constantly repackage obvious business goals like "sell more stuff" as "increase sales velocity" because they think using the right keywords is the same thing as intelligence. This performative but ultimately useless behavior is the primary reason for their exorbitant salaries. They distract everyone from the reality that the company is stealing all the money the business generates.

Sum all that up and you get a superfluously verbose moron working with bad data to make decisions that have, at best, marginal impact on the stated goal of the organization and consumes a hugely inflated amount of resources in the process. That does sound like the perfect human equivalent of an LLM to me.

[–] CovertOperative@piefed.zip 1 points 6 days ago

they simply ingest data and spit out logical decisions based on that data.

And that's exactly what LLMs are good at. Okay, they're probabilistic and not logical, but the end result is similar, especially since humans often fail at logic. But it's undeniable LLM can go through lots of data much better than CEOs.