this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
150 points (83.5% liked)

Android

17677 readers
27 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You should blame me then. Once I saw that Google wasn't going to honor steam library on stadia, and then charge full price for games on stadia, I noped out and never signed up.

I say this is a cloud gamer who uses G-Force now, and shadow. I was their target demographic. And they're pricing model just noped me out of it

[–] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Once I saw that Google wasn't going to honor steam library on stadia

That is such a weird complaint.

Google doesn't own Steam. Google has nothing to do with Steam. Why would Google give you free games just because you purchased those same games on a competing platform?

Are you also complaining that Sony isn't honoring your Steam library on the PlayStation? Are you complaining that Microsoft isn't honoring the Steam library on the XBox?

Heck, are you complaining that Steam isn't honoring the Nintendo Switch library on the Steam Deck?

I mean: what gives?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's a good question. In my view Google was selling remote compute, remote graphics rendering, and charging a subscription fee for that. Just like GeForce now. Remember GeForce now and shadow, we're both remote game streaming platforms that existed before stadia.

So Google comes along and says hey for a little bit more money than GeForce now, we're going to let you render and stream games from our data centers. Just like GeForce now just like shadow.

Unlike those other platforms, you can't bring your own library, you have to also buy the games from us, at full retail price. Even if the game is cheaper on steam.

So it was both a subscription service, and a wall garden with higher than normal prices.

It's like subscribing to Netflix, and also having to buy the movies to watch. Pick your lane Google

Anyway I understand your position, I'm just trying to articulate as a cloud gamer at the time stadia came out, I was enthusiastic, but disappointed with their pricing model which didn't seem competitive.

I think their options were to a, charge a monthly subscription, and allow people to bring their own libraries, like the steam library.

Or b. Charge for games, and then stream for free.

Doing both puts them in a significant market disadvantage, and I didn't want to own games that were tied to a Google platform, because Google has a long storied history of shutting down platforms after a few years. I didn't want to own games on a platform that would disappear. 100% Google's reputation prevented me from trying out their platform because I didn't trust them to be around for more than a few years

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You didn’t need the premium subscription to stream your games. You could stream at 720p for free if you purchased the game. Blame Google’s marketing for making it seem like you did though

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 year ago

I had no idea, thanks for pointing that out.

[–] Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know who else doesn't honor steam library? PlayStation or Xbox. What a weird take

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At the time stadia came out as a game streaming platform Geforce now, and Shadow already were established, both of those services charged a subscription but let you bring your own library.

Google's Offering required you to subscribe AND buy full priced retail games that you couldn't use elsewhere, so it wasn't competitive with geforce now and shadow.

It's not a weird take..... because Geforce now and shadow are both still in business now, and stadia is not, they were not able to convince cloud gamers to take their offer.

[–] Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Stadia did not require you to subscribe. You could just buy the game and play. Unlike GeForce. You don't even know what the fuck you are talking about.

Stadia subscription only brought in 4k and monthly games. The base was free. And you down vote my comment like you fucking made a point. Learn to Google before commenting dumb ass

Edit: not only that the base was free there were free to play games like destiny 2 where the only thing you needed was a Google account.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Lots of hostility and name calling, are you ok?

Also, I didn't down vote your comment.

https://www.ign.com/wikis/stadia-google-game-console/Google_Stadia_Price_Breakdown%2C_Release_Date%2C_and_Launch_Games

I didn't realize they allowed people to stream purchased games for free, my mistake, thank you for the correction. According to IGN article, the free games were if you had a subscription.

It's a mystery why cloud gamers didn't flock to google then. My core point about stadia not being competitive with geforce now and shadow stills stands, even though I got the details wrong about being about to stream purchased games for free.

[–] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 3 points 1 year ago

Another stadia user here.

I loved the service but he neglected to tell you cyberpunk looked like hot garbage compared to its PC equivalent.

I pretty much only used it for Destiny, and I too spent hundreds of dollars supporting the platform only to get it all back.

The convenience was wonderful, but worthless if they didn’t have what you wanted to play, and Google became less and less interested in working with developers as time went on.

[–] jose1324@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm just articulating why I, as a cloud gamer at the time they release their product, stayed with different providers. They didn't exist in the vacuum, GeForce now, and shadow, both existed, allowed you to use a pre-existing libraries, didn't charge per game.

GeForce now was cheaper, Shadow was more expensive but provided better resolution.

So Google comes into the mix, and their option, while I wanted to try it, wasn't palatable for me as a cloud gamer at the time.

Scenario 1: buy the game on steam, play it on local hardware, or GeForce now for $5 a month

Scenario 2: buy the game on steam, play it on shadow, or local hardware, for $20 a month

Scenario 3: by the game from Google for more than it costs on steam, only be able to play it on stadia, and pay I think it was $15 a month.

You can see why I chose scenarios 1 and 2 instead.