this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
1264 points (99.5% liked)

tumblr

6463 readers
19 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tja@programming.dev 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Shouldn't "paid" be a a huge advantage, if we are complaining about advertising?

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Main problem with "paid" is that you have to log in for searching = all your searches can be tied to your payment into / identity. That's a big no-no.

[–] crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not to mention Kagi is based in the U.S. Whatever privacy promises they make are bullshit.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Either bullshit or delusional (which amounts to bullshit for the users) if they don't realize that they can't do anything about a FISA court order. Do they have a warrant canary at least?

[–] adoxographer@feddit.dk 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes: https://kagi.com/privacy

They also have options for anonymous search.

I’m curious about how well they enforce that, and how as a European on European servers they do more, but I wil assume it’s all transparent to state actors. As are all others.

The benefits are in corporations and being monetized.

Yeah they will all be transparent to state actors. Which is why the best option imo is to mix our searches by doing them in private browser windows of different browsers, occasionally wiping history and sometimes using VPN / tor

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

VPN providers and torrent sites solved this a while ago, allowing anonymous payments: crypto, even mailing cash.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are you really so naive to assume that your searches tied together won't allow to identify you within days? Please never work in cybersecurity.

Also, crypto coins are a scam nowadays, thanks to the investment markets making them unstable as fuck.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bad news for you, I do work in cybersecurity (for over a decade), and I don't search for "hot singles in my exact address", so a bunch of k8s error message searches and the odd banana bread recipe won't identify me in a while.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Working in cybersecurity and mistaking your own online behavior as being relevant for everyone else. How could that possibly backfire? /s

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If someone cares, they have to be careful. No amount of anonymous tor usage will prevent exposing you if you Google your name and social security number.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You shouldn't go around advising people to use anonymous payment methods for search engines that "protect your privacy". That's really bad advice, is all I am saying. But good for you...

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They protect your privacy as much as a search engine can.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You really need to step back and reevaluate.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In this scenario: Your assessment of the reality of what "protecting people's privacy" means.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 11 hours ago

Some protection is better than none. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not everyone on the Internet has money to burn.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

So then we need to choose between advertising or demanding unpaid labor...

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

we need that altruistic billionaire just doing it for the love of the consumer

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

yeah you know that's how most of them become billionaires, by being altruistic and always putting others before their own needs.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

It's a difficult choice indeed

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

no one's demanding unpaid labor