this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
570 points (99.8% liked)

196

6825 readers
3001 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Sure. My point isn't communism bad, it's that the idea isn't capitalism "causing" LGBT oppression and communism is sunshine and rainbow flags.

Like when atheists bitch about how "imagine no religion" would make everything great, and neglect to explain how they would get there. Like when the atheist Khamer rouge killed 50,000+ religious people in the name of atheism.

Folks, turns out it's authoritarianism that causes oppression of civil liberties, not economic systems.

[–] Micromot@piefed.social 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

But capitalism does cause the oppression. It's the us vs them mentality engrained deeply in society. People always have to be better and greater than others and everything is about competition. This makes people reject change because they fear that their status might be harmed by trying something new and the state spending money on other things.

It's also not as direct of a solution as just killing all capitalists because the underlying system would remain the same and just produce more capitalists.

Capitalists do everything to distract from class-consciousness and creating outgroups helps a lot with this.

Free capitalism without "authoritarianism" also leads to oppression as one group would start hording wealth and indoctrinating the people to fight difference so they can keep the wealth they accumulated. This happens without forcing anything unto people by convincing them that they can also achieve wealth.

The people profiting from the status quo will always defend it

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

you can spin that about anything.

[–] Micromot@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

But it's the case. Do you knows who owns most of the US media and the mass media in other countries?

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Micromot@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

But it is the material conditions leading to oppresion. All other explanations are either idealistic in the sense that they attribute some magic human nature or they are heavily simplified without addressing the root causes

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

guess what, shitty material conditions can lead to oppression no matter what economic system you use, because natural disasters ruining crops have existed since the dawn of agriculture.

EDIT : Oh, and them causing famine has happened to every goddamn economic system of governance.

[–] Micromot@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Without a state they would have much less effect though as the means of production would be serving the people only and not exploiting them for profit. This is the theory layed out by marx, the way there includes unions etc. because they can kmprove the conditions for the workers which also leads to minorities being treated better as the workers become aware of their role in the system.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Without a state they would have much less effect though as the means of production would be serving the people only and not exploiting them for profit.

...

Thanks for not reading what I wrote. People relying on subsistance farming are even more vulnerable to natural disasters leading to famine, which by definition is a shitty material condition.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The khmer* rouge didn't kill people "in the name of atheism". They were largely copying the Chinese "great leap forward" pushing to cultural unification through genocide of minority groups. Yes, many of those groups were religious minorities, but to say they killed them in the name of atheism is like saying that the soviets killed people because they hate freedom. It's obscenely disingenuous and clearly said to push an agenda.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khmer_Rouge#Relationship_to_religion

Nevertheless, it has been estimated that nearly 25,000 Buddhist monks were killed by the regime.[71]

They were largely copying the Chinese “great leap forward” pushing to cultural unification through genocide of minority groups.

And this is ok?

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

No, but I clearly didn't say that. I just said you're assigned the wrong reason for their actions. They didn't do it because they were atheist. They targeted waaaaaay more people than religious groups. They did what China is doing now to the uyghurs. It's clearly a terrible thing, you're just trying to manufacture an atheist pogrom when this was your standard totalitarian cultural genocide.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago

Oppressive threats to their livelihood makes people unsympathetic and some people hateful and jealous.