this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
280 points (99.0% liked)

Canada

12612 readers
597 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago (6 children)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How is bombing a wedding a lawful order?

The military is trained to be mindless sychophants.

[–] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They weren't ordered to bomb a wedding, they either thought it was something else or they missed another target. They just don't give a shit that they bombed a wedding.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Source?

Cuz here's one of many they did after 9/11

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mukaradeeb_wedding_party_massacre

You see, if a single guest is on their kill lists that means anyone near them is a "valid military target by association" and "acceptable collateral damage"

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's technically not illegal to invade another country unprovoked. It's illegal to do war crimes though. You can invade a country and annex it without committing warcrimes.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

I guess if your shit hole country doesn't adhere to international law.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No it is literally illegal to invade another country unprovoked, the crime is called "war of aggression". It is one of the foundational pillars of international law. The Nuremberg judgement called aggressive war the "supreme international crime". This is the reason US shuns and delegitimizes the ICC and the ICJ, the two bodies supposedly enforcing international law.

It is also separately illegal to annex another country even by mere threat of force, even if no actual force was used.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 2 months ago

It isn't, but Congress is pretending it is which is the same thing.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

War isn't actually illegal. I know it feels like it should be, but it really isn't. People say a war is "illegal" because I suppose they feel like it carries more weight than to just say it's "immoral". I guess it's somehow comforting to people to think that somehow some lawyers could prevent countries from going to war somehow.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But there are illegal wars. Iran right now is illegal it wasn't approved by Congress. Trump is basically using legal bullfuckery and a lack of consequences to do that shit.

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Congress allows the executive branch to do so, this war is not an abuse of the legal system it's being used as intended

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Lawful /= you agree with it, basically.

To see why this is definitely within the powers the president has, swap "Canada" for "Vietnam", "Iraq" or "Iran". For more detail, you'd have to refer to the actual laws of war the US government recognises.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like it's high time America was dissolved and balkanized, then.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There isn't any nation where the military can just disagree. Even under a military junta, it's only the junta itself that gets a say; everyone lower down must follow orders (even the ones involving atrocities, in that case. The West is weird for exempting something).

That said, yeah, America isn't looking so good these days.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It never did. It was founded on genocide and slavery.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Yes, .ml person. I'm sure you believe that. And also that North Korea is better, somehow. 'Nuff said.

Edit: Clearly, the username is ironic, with this much effort to get into a fight.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you don't believe that both the US and Canada were founded on unspeakable genocide (which inspired the holocaust BTW) and slavery you are delusional. North Korea (for all its faults) was founded by those who resisted and fought the genocidal oppressors. Read a damn book.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I believe in history, lol? Why are you bringing up North Korea?

Is your brain okay?

Edit: clearly this person wasn't interested in a conversation at all, based on my instance, lol?

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 months ago

Because its a hypothetical where the journalist didnt specify "unlawful order". Its a bs gocha question. There are hypothetical situations where it would be lawful, regardless of how likely.