this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
580 points (99.8% liked)

World News

57926 readers
3582 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The transfer was carried out partially by buying and selling and partly by physically transferring gold, the Dutch national bank said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

They do have a nice and close weight, but their radioactivity gives them away.

Tungsten has a density of 19.25g/cm3. Compared to Gold with 19.32g/cm3, they are rather close. Uranium is a little less dense at 19.16g/cm3.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

idk, i'd rather have the tungsten than the gold

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

WTF! We can do that? Just post gifs on the internet?!

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

No but seriously how did you do that? Did you upload a .gif as an image? This will open up an ocean of... Good use for me!

[–] Tango@piefed.ca 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Bear in mind though, that your instance (in your case, lemmy.world) will bear the cost of storing your .gif, and lemmy.world doesn't have ad revenue to pay for that like Reddit does. So use .gifs sparingly.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

I will use it sparingly! Thank you!

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

there should be a button to view the source of my comments, but basically:

![alt text](imagesourcehtmllink)

for those of y'all who would like to skip the tutorial, skip itif you include the ! it renders the image or gif (the link needs to be a direct path to the image, not just the page it's on. it might take a little experimenting. it did for me) and if you don't it just has the text and a link to the image.

without the !

first image: I NEED TUNGSTEN TO LIVE

with the !

first image: I NEED TUNGSTEN TO LIVE

i have been told if we add "hovertext" after the link (but still in the parens) we can add hovertext, but i haven't experimented with nor figured it out yet so i can't really advise you on it, sorry. there's always bigger fish.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I will use it sparingly! Thank you!

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

go nuts. just, like, if you do drop spoilers on it so you don't clog the whole damn page

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago