this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
134 points (91.9% liked)

movies

3916 readers
518 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
atomicpoet@piefed.social
BoozeOrWater@piefed.social
TheImpressiveX@piefed.social
doug@lemmy.today
134
Gal Gadot Defends Starring in Movie With AI Sets and Lighting Because ‘You’re Going to Work With It or Be Out of the Game’; Lawyers Spent 6 Months Ensuring AI Would Not Alter Actors (variety.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by TheImpressiveX@piefed.social to c/movies@piefed.social
55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hollywood has tried to make supermodels into movie stars before. Pam Anderson is the one that jumps to mind, Have you ever seen Barb Wire?

[–] EddieEpoxy@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

Pam Anderson was already a bankable celebrity by the time Barb Wire came out due to the popularity of Baywatch, and the financial investment for that particular movie was considerably lower than anything Gadot has done: Barb Wire had a $9 million budget, while Gadot's first headliner, Wonder Woman, had a budget of $149 million. Plus investors in the 90s understood if the movie didn't do well in the box office they could still make their money back on video rentals.