this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
64 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

43468 readers
340 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Novocirab@feddit.org 9 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Good article. The most important points imo are these:

Despite the recent momentum, advocates like Marthews worry that too much of the pushback is limited to Flock itself. Even now, competitors like Axon smell blood in the water, and they’re moving in to capitalize on the widespread public scrutiny of the company. It highlights what privacy advocates see as a critical vulnerability in the current tech backlash movement — the tendency to focus on one or two highly villainized companies instead of the technologies and systems themselves.

“... I think it’s an important moment because reformers are talking more and more about ‘guardrails,’ when the proper solution is abolition.”

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 2 points 18 hours ago

"All we need is some guardrails... and then some guardrails for the guardrails... and some guardrails for those guardrails... it'll be fine, swearsies."