this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
87 points (100.0% liked)

Anarchism

3275 readers
75 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.


Other anarchist comms


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

HTML is not valid markdown. Expecting other clients to break standards because one did is not backwards compatibility

I'm quite ignorant on this all, so correct me if i say errors, but isn't Markdown a text-to-HTML syntax ?

That's what i get from the Wikipedia page, and from both specifications it mentions :

For any markup that is not covered by Markdown’s syntax, you simply use HTML itself. There’s no need to preface it or delimit it to indicate that you’re switching from Markdown to HTML; you just use the tags.

An HTML block is a group of lines that is treated as raw HTML (and will not be escaped in HTML output).

[–] waltersf@bookwyr.me -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This is some random website, not the standard. And even then, it explicitly says "Many Markdown applications allow you to use HTML", not Markdown itself. The section on images does not mention img tags. A couple lines down:

For security reasons, not all Markdown applications support HTML in Markdown