this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
41 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

43468 readers
371 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] A_be_seedy@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As someone that has worked in data centers and now is working adjacent to data centers (and I make a higher salary because of data centers), greenhouse emissions isn't so much the problem.

The bigger problem is that planned data centers are are demanding more power than exists on the grid. This is setting us back from our plans to greenify the grid, like the article mentioned, it's causing coal plants to remain open.

While there will be a need for data centers, and even AI data centers, the reality is that we are in an AI bubble right now. While probably near every data center in existence right now, will probably continue to be operated, many of the data centers being built in the next 5 will not. Understanding where the data center industry will be in 5 years is key to understanding how we should maintain and improve our grid. Right now we are on a path to rolling blackouts, and that will increase emissions too, and generally make life worse for everyone.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You say we like it's everyone. It isn't.

My province in Canada had the electricity provider cap how much gets allocated to new data centers per year at a sustainable number.

Regulation instead of outright bans are the correct path forward.

[–] A_be_seedy@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm just going to leave the quote from the first key article take away (the second full sentence after the headline) to justify my use of the word "we"

Sixty planned US data centers will emit 101.5 million tons of CO2 annually once operational.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you saying that states can't regulate this? They absolutely can.

[–] A_be_seedy@beehaw.org 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Nah. I'm agreeing with you that AI data centers aren't as much of a problem in Canada because it appears that they are regulating them.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Except for Alberta, which totally tracks because it's the Texas of Canada.