this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
24 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

55367 readers
112 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Phone= 13

Lappy= 6

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] TootSweet@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Only 29.

Well, 30 now that I opened this thread in a new tab.

But yeah. That's on the low side compared to usual for me.

(Firefox on a Raspberry Pi 4.)

[โ€“] eldavi@lemmy.ml 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

how does it do with videos using your browser?

[โ€“] TootSweet@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

My experience is that the performance of videos depends a lot on how much of the screen the video takes up. More so than on the quality setting (480p, 720p, 1080p). Usually when I want to watch a video, I limit it to about 1/4 of the area of my 1920x1080 screen. But YouTube is pretty watchable. I don't think even when you select something like 720p@60fps or whatever that it ever actually gets up to 60fps, and sometimes the parts that don't compress as well drop a few frames (strobing in particular does that), but it's really not bad if you're ok with not doing full-screen.

Also, it depends where the video is hosted. If the JS is really light on the page, it's way more performant. If the JS is really heavy, I sometimes have to wait tens of seconds for it to render the first frame.

But also, this Raspberry Pi is mostly my Lemmy box. Not my main box.

[โ€“] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Damn, I'm impressed that your rpi can handle that many tabs. Mine can only handle a few loaded pages at a time

[โ€“] TootSweet@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

My experience is that it has more to do with what's loaded in the tab than how many tabs are open. One tab can cause everything to run at like 1fps if it's bloated. ("Graphic design is my passion" kind of pages with tons of animations, usually.) But 100 Lemmy-UI tabs is no problem at all.