this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
250 points (91.7% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

47292 readers
1679 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Gallery image 2

Gallery image 3

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Let's not pretend like it's normal for the media to show women unshaved.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That has nothing to do with what I said.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The discussion isn't around the differences in people's body hair. It's about media's representation of women's bodies.

Your comment would have more of a point if it was commonplace to see unshaved women in media.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

If it was common place to see unshaved women then my comment wouldn’t have made any damn sense. My comment is only relevant because there are people who don’t shave and yet still look like they do.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The most likely reason the actress was portrayed as unshaven was because women are overwhelmingly presented as hairless in media. Not because some people have naturally light hair.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

OK, nothing I have said is against that point. So your point is fuck me for adding to the conversation or what?

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I already explained why I replied to your comment - the reason this actress is portrayed as hairless is because we live in a patriarchal society that has strict gender expressions for women and that includes being hairless.

I wish that the conversation could be around the differences in people's bodies instead of the media presenting a very specific image of how women are supposed to present.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I started this thread talking about body hair differences you’re the one who tried to change the subject. Be the change you want to see in the world.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Be the change you want to see in the world.

I am.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

How? You described wanting to live in a world where we could talk about body hair differences and yet you’re the person who wasn’t talking about body hair differences.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Because this actress was still portrayed as hairless despite the circumstances the show set up.

Show me where it's normalized to show women with body hair in media.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Fun fact: I don’t have to show you shit to leave a comment talking about my spouse’s nearly transparent arm hair.

Seriously, are you doing OK? In the last couple of weeks I have noticed you seeming to be ultra pedantic and quick to get into cyclical arguments. Maybe I just didn’t notice it before because I didn’t disagree with whatever you were commenting. IDK.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I took your initial comment as defending the show's choice to continue to push the narrative that it's normal for all women to be hairless.

Considering another commenter came in to say that armpit hair is the same as ass hair caked in literal shit, yeah, I'm being a little defensive.

I'm sorry.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I am also guilty of jumping to the defense of things and making assumptions. I appreciate your apology and I hope you have a great day!

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 hours ago

Thanks for accepting it and I hope you have a good day, too!