this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
456 points (98.7% liked)

Not The Onion

22633 readers
1221 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Tbh the possesive form of "it" is a bitch. For all other words you do 's to indicate possession, but for this exact word you leave out the apostrophe. Whether vs weather, their, there, vs they're, or your vs you're, they all have nothing on this contra intuitive POS of a rule.

Also the correct response to your comment would be: always has been

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For all other words you do 's to indicate possession

Only if the words are nouns, not for pronouns. "Its" is a possessive pronoun, like his, hers, ours, yours, theirs. None of those words use apostrophes.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Motherforking shirtballs! You made it make sense. Of cause "it" is a pronoun, and thus follows pronoun rules. Thank you.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

No problem! Fwiw, I think you're definitely right that it's unintuitive, as is the English language's love of homonyms in general. I can't imagine how frustrating it must be for non-native speakers.

Specifically because it conflicts with the contraction "it's", at least that's how I remember.