this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
58 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24446 readers
305 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Finally ready to switch my final windows device over to linux, but I'm running into a problem. NTFS drives aren't a good idea under Linux, but my 4 NTFS drives are this full. I own zero extra hard drives, and do not want to spend $300 on another one.

How can I bring these files into Bazzite WITHOUT just wiping everything and re-downloading 10+ terabytes of movies, shows, music, games, and other data I refuse to delete?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Fortunately the D and E drives are Movies and TV, respectively. F is games. My plan is to run Linux 99% of the time, and I can probably keep the few games or random pieces of software I can only run under Windows on the windows C drive.

Basically I just want to have a Windows SSD as a backup.

Would it be better to reformat the D and E drives as exFAT if I can cycle the content through another drive or something? I'd like to be able to access those two drives under both Bazzite and Windows.

[–] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think exFAT would be a step down from NTFS. NTFS is a journaling filesystem which makes it a lot more robust against data corruption than exFAT. It also has a number of more advanced features (for a 30 year old filesystem) like symlinks, transparent compression, and sparse files. NTFS is also less prone to fragmentation than the FAT family of filesystems. On the other hand, exFAT doesn't eliminate any of the potential compatibility problems (like the potential to create a file named "C:"). The only thing exFAT has going for it is that Microsoft has actually published a specification for it, but in practice NTFS has been reverse-engineered enough to have multiple reliable third-party implementations.

If you need Windows and Linux to access the same filesystem, NTFS is the least bad option (the best option is probably setting up a NAS for this amount of data). Another option is to install third-party ext2/3/4 or btrfs drivers on Windows, but last time I looked into this, they weren't very robust.

[–] Enjoyer_of_Games@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

Would it be better to reformat the D and E drives as exFAT if I can cycle the content through another drive or something? I'd like to be able to access those two drives under both Bazzite and Windows.

Ideally yes.

If you can't then it will still all work most of the time but occasionally the drives will unmount from linux with block errors etc and will not work until you boot windows and run chkdsk. You can use ntfsfix on linux but it doesn't always work.

[–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

Imo it's best to leave D and E as NTFS. Maybe down the line you'll end up with some swap space (maybe after you get that SSD for Windows), but for now it'll work. I'd focus on getting the C drive empty as you can using the spare space in your other drives, then use it for Linux with a 200GB partition at the end of the drive for Windows.

I can't advise re: games.