this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
58 points (100.0% liked)
technology
24446 readers
305 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments

Fortunately the D and E drives are Movies and TV, respectively. F is games. My plan is to run Linux 99% of the time, and I can probably keep the few games or random pieces of software I can only run under Windows on the windows C drive.
Basically I just want to have a Windows SSD as a backup.
Would it be better to reformat the D and E drives as exFAT if I can cycle the content through another drive or something? I'd like to be able to access those two drives under both Bazzite and Windows.
I think exFAT would be a step down from NTFS. NTFS is a journaling filesystem which makes it a lot more robust against data corruption than exFAT. It also has a number of more advanced features (for a 30 year old filesystem) like symlinks, transparent compression, and sparse files. NTFS is also less prone to fragmentation than the FAT family of filesystems. On the other hand, exFAT doesn't eliminate any of the potential compatibility problems (like the potential to create a file named "C:"). The only thing exFAT has going for it is that Microsoft has actually published a specification for it, but in practice NTFS has been reverse-engineered enough to have multiple reliable third-party implementations.
If you need Windows and Linux to access the same filesystem, NTFS is the least bad option (the best option is probably setting up a NAS for this amount of data). Another option is to install third-party ext2/3/4 or btrfs drivers on Windows, but last time I looked into this, they weren't very robust.
Ideally yes.
If you can't then it will still all work most of the time but occasionally the drives will unmount from linux with block errors etc and will not work until you boot windows and run chkdsk. You can use ntfsfix on linux but it doesn't always work.
Imo it's best to leave D and E as NTFS. Maybe down the line you'll end up with some swap space (maybe after you get that SSD for Windows), but for now it'll work. I'd focus on getting the C drive empty as you can using the spare space in your other drives, then use it for Linux with a 200GB partition at the end of the drive for Windows.
I can't advise re: games.