this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
205 points (91.5% liked)

Mildly Interesting

27458 readers
21 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 33 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Idk about the rest of the software on this list, but presenting gimp as an "alternative" to photoshop seems disingenuous to me.

Gimp is an alternative to photoshop in the same way that a 56K modem is an alternative to a 1 gig fiber line. Yes, they technically do the same job. But to suggest that your experience is going to be comparable to photoshop is a stretch.

[–] ServantOfRa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'd suggest Krita before Gimp, and even Affinity (although I'm sure there's a gotcha coming with that one)

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Krita is the way to go. Even has AI retouching add-on if you're into that.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I've been using Photoshop for 24 years and I gave Affinity a try. Affinity still has a lot of kinks to work out. Cross compatibility wrt brushes and tools is spotty at best, unusable at worst. UI and workflow/workspace definitely needs improvement. No right click to adjust brush size and no saveable workspace option was a dealbreaker for me.

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

GIMP is also a massive pain in the ass. Paint.net is the one piece of software I still miss after moving to Linux.

Da Vinci Resolve is great though. Crazy that it's free and Linux compatible.

[–] missing_string@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm switching to Linux right now and I haven't really looked into replacements for each piece of software. Used Paint.net for at least 10 years, tried Gimp first but didn't like it. What do you use?

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Try Pinta. Unless you do digital painting/illustration, then go for Krita.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The image doesn't say it's a replacement, it says it's an alternative. What piece of sofware would you suggest instead?

[–] Robotunicorn@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Same with Inkscape IMO. Anyone have a different alternative?

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Dunno how advanced its vector graphics features are, but krita does support making them at least, you could try that. The overall interface is good at least.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah GIMP is shit. Anyone who says otherwise has no idea what they’re talking about. Inkscape is better than gimp but still suffers from UI issues.

[–] revelrous@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Depends what you are doing. If you are drawing-krita, if you are manipulating images-gimp, making svg stuff-inkscape. I've been using gimp long enough that the newest photoshop makes me want to crashout.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Quality features often confuse people.

[–] revelrous@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah, pretty sure it was the ai jammed in everything.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So then you admit that pre-AI Photoshop was significantly better than gimp. Thanks

[–] revelrous@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh. Hands down. I miss the old creative suites. But the current product? Glitchy pos. Fuck em. Once you use gimp for a few years the pain dulls. Now how you think inkscape is comparable to illustrator is baffling. Is illustrator also a shitshow now?

[–] Krusty@quokk.au 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The GUI/UX is shit. If you wanna design automated workflows from the shell, it can be quite flexible and powerful.

Like they used to have a website that would generate tags or like styled text. They used GIMP for the backend image generation. I thought that was a pretty impressive use case.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au -1 points 2 days ago
[–] Krusty@quokk.au 2 points 2 days ago

Gimpshop i think it's called at least tries to make the GIMP workflow and UX (including keyboard short cuts) not completely, well, gimped.

[–] chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Photopea is pretty good for casual use