this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
206 points (91.5% liked)

Mildly Interesting

27475 readers
85 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah GIMP is shit. Anyone who says otherwise has no idea what they’re talking about. Inkscape is better than gimp but still suffers from UI issues.

[–] revelrous@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Depends what you are doing. If you are drawing-krita, if you are manipulating images-gimp, making svg stuff-inkscape. I've been using gimp long enough that the newest photoshop makes me want to crashout.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au -5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Quality features often confuse people.

[–] revelrous@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nah, pretty sure it was the ai jammed in everything.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So then you admit that pre-AI Photoshop was significantly better than gimp. Thanks

[–] revelrous@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh. Hands down. I miss the old creative suites. But the current product? Glitchy pos. Fuck em. Once you use gimp for a few years the pain dulls. Now how you think inkscape is comparable to illustrator is baffling. Is illustrator also a shitshow now?

[–] Krusty@quokk.au 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The GUI/UX is shit. If you wanna design automated workflows from the shell, it can be quite flexible and powerful.

Like they used to have a website that would generate tags or like styled text. They used GIMP for the backend image generation. I thought that was a pretty impressive use case.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au -1 points 3 days ago