this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
385 points (98.0% liked)

Memes

16633 readers
1642 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
385
No Spoilers 👁️⃤ (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by diffaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/memes@sopuli.xyz
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 35 points 16 hours ago (8 children)

what i kinda don't get about this whole thing ... is that kinda, in other countries (look at the middle east), they get bombed daily and none of you bats an eye (well, some do, but still, this has been going on for 50 years and i hardly ever hear anyone talking about it). meanwhile you get one terrorist attack and everyone's supposed to lose their minds over this.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

It's just so blown up because it hurt american pride.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

I lost 14 colleagues and none of them were American. Was the response overblown? Yes. But it's called the "World" Trade center for a reason.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 hours ago

The US never gets attacked. There's an ally to the north, an ally to the south, and two big fucking oceans to the east and west. So, when it does happen, it's a pretty big deal.

[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 5 points 10 hours ago

racism i think. that time the "supreme race" got attacked

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 10 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

People outside the US dont care or aren't expected to care about 9/11. Americans are loud and own the platforms so it seems like the entire world but its really just them treating the entire internet like an American fourm.

People in NZ still schzio out about a French terrorist attack that happened to us 40 years ago. I still see news bring it up.

[–] pipe01@programming.dev 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, it's a terrorist attack involving multiple simultaneous plane hijacks crashing into the center of one of the most populated cities in the world. Not that we should rank terrorism, but...

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org -1 points 11 hours ago

yeah and i find it weird how little attention is given to the symbolic targets ... the World Trade Center was largely involved in establishing cross-country businesses ... in other words, meddling within other country's internal economics (often to the dismay of the local population). by far not all people in the world wanted free trade. so they attacked the free trade center ... and that was a symbol against free trade, free trade being an unwanted thing by many other people around the globe because it meant the disruption of native economic systems, etc.

and yet that fact that free trade is not globally understood as something universally good, and that maybe there should be less of it, ... i don't think that i've ever heard any newspaper talk about that.

[–] Napster153@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago

Control the media, control the mind.

It's not about the actual casualties and destruction, it's about how you can spin it into your favour.

American Democracy got suckered for over 20 years to put oligarchs in power.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

America has been punching and kicking countless countries since WWII, causing thousands if not millions of deaths (Iraqi "freedom" alone caused like 300.000 Iraqi deaths IIRC) and the second that somebody punches back and gives them a bloody nose its all crying and needing to make 50 movies about the heroes of that day, and of course it was immediately used to implement the "patriot" act (hint, it has shit to do with patriotism and everything with making the IS an autocratic state)

I get it, of course. For the individuals that died or were injured that day, it's a tragedy, but as a country? They completely deserved it and much, much more

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

What it was used to justify is unforgivable, but please remember that a population of ~350m people is not a monolith. Our government is garbage, but many of us were aware of what was being done in the name of "national security" and protesting /voting against it at the time.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 hours ago

You’re spot on, and that said tragedy was exploited to do even more cruelty makes it even worse

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Do you think maybe there's a way to phrase that where you're not saying that 2,000 innocent people deserved to die?

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 0 points 9 hours ago

How about "The worlds most advanced military power allowed 2000 deaths to occur, all to further allow its parent state to tighten restrictions on free movement, increase surveillance on innocent civilians, and garner support for an invasion of an unrelated country?"

[–] dismay3915@lemmy.world -2 points 9 hours ago

*One terrorost attack from your own government