There are 3 steps in the meme. "Nauseated and having not eaten." "Eating." "And nauseated after having eaten." So this person is clearly nauseated for reason beyond hunger or having eaten, unless their nausea before was cause from hunger and the nausea after was caused by eating spoiled food.

Also hunger does not cause me nausea, so... no can't say I relate directly. It can for my wife though, so I have dealt with that situation. But if she was nauseated, ate something, and then was still nauseated, then clearly it wasnt the hunger causing her nausea. It was something else, like a flu, meds, or digestive issues.

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're not getting it because your body doesn't do this. That's ok. Your wife probably does then.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I don't see what there is to "get". I understand what you are saying. I'm saying that you are projecting meaning onto the meme that isn't there, or are trying to conflate it with some other meaning. The point still stands, regardless of how your body reacts to hunger, that if your nausea is persistent regardless of whether or not you have eaten recently, then your issue isnt simply related to whether you have eaten, is it? There is nothing to get beyond that.