this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
38 points (97.5% liked)

chat

8640 readers
183 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think this might be the same person who did this last time, it's very close to where I saw the last one. Which the city dealt with in a matter of days from when I saw it, so maybe this particular canvas of street art will also get cleaned/painted over.

(I'm not against street art - I'm rather fond of some of the prettier examples of it as an art form, and tagging is an interesting form of self expression - I just said that in that I'm curious how long it will take the city to do something about this tag, since the previous one I found on City property also caused it and nearby graffiti to be quickly cleaned when previously ignored, and graffiti on a trash receptacle is the ultimate "not worth cleaning".)


This user is suspected of being a bear. Please report any suspawcious behaviour.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

graffiti includes things that aren't reasonably art, like whoever wrote hemp on that dumpster in normal ass letters. i'd scarequote "street art" because it's euphemistic and because in context we're including stuff that's less artistic than drawing a dong on the bathroom stall.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

All art is a form of progression from crude to elegant. In fact, you can even see that there are relational forms inside that specific tag that also appear in some other more "elegant" tags. For example:

The M in HEMP:

Other Ms in the image:

There is a pretty clear language of strokes and movements between these characters. Some of these are done in paint marker, others in spray paint. Learning how to control a spray can is an important skill to hone. Often these people lack the space to practice this, and even practicing it (if they are a youth) can be viewed negatively within their own home. These could be part of an initiation process as well. I really don't know. However, to say that this is not "reasonably" art is, I think, disingenuous because art is a process that you hone over time. I don't think people go out into the street and write HEMP on a dumpster for no reason. They do it because they are either A) being initiated into something or B) practicing. The reason you would be out in the field practicing is because the activity isn't just about producing the art; it's about producing the art without getting caught.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 1 points 2 hours ago

an infinitely wide category is a useless category. When we write our names on a "Get Well Soon!" card for a coworker we are not, as a baseline, doing art and if you insist that's automatically art 100% of the time i think it's impossible to have a discussion about art with you and suspect you of lying about not having fences.

[–] alexei_1917@hexbear.net 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

This. I'm a big fan of street art... when it comes to graffiti on par with/below bathroom stall dicks (which I'd argue can have some artistic value, depending on the amount of detail and if it's drawn doing something, even if it's "gross" subject matter) for artistic meaning, well, I can appreciate the "fuck the system" of it, especially on the property of corporations or shitty governments (less so on municipal infrastructure in a city that does its best to meet public needs, though), but I can acknowledge that a lot of it is kinda ugly.

Actual street art, though, graffiti with artistic meaning and aesthetic value, I'm a lot more in favour of, because yeah, it can look quite pretty or interesting, and I appreciate the effort that goes into it. Street art is a valid art form, and I dislike the use of that term as a euphemism for low effort tagging.


This user is suspected of being a bear. Please report any suspawcious behaviour.