this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
-18 points (28.6% liked)

Fuck AI

7729 readers
2545 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thought it relevant to this community and posted it to have a discussion on this topic. I am not the author of this blog nor do I endorse the authors views.

Before leaving an upvote or a downvote (a function that IMO should be reserved to posts/comments that are offtopic, made in bad faith or low quality), please first read the blog post.

TL;DR: Author of the blog is criticising Codeberg outright banning LLM and crypto projects. Author thinks this approach is not nuanced enough and introduces censorship to the platform. Author therefore decided to selfhost his projects that the author previously had migrated to Codeberg.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wow, awful awful take.

The counterargument against the 'team of one' argument codeberg made completely glosses over the argument that codeberg was making: that llm projects often include unnecessary tooling that requires more of codeberg's resources than their userbase really needs. The fact that one person projects have always existed does not address the argument, it is a complete red herring.

Their proposed solution is to create a for-profit section of codeberg so that vibe coders are still allowed while not costing brain users more. Why? Honestly why? Just go somewhere else at that point. Why should codeberg create a safe space for you?

The censorship thing is absolutely ridiculous too. Codeberg is not the government, terms of service that you consent to are not forcing censorship on anybody. That's a reactionary slop argument, and only serves to belittle and normalize the harm that actual censorship of science, art, political opinions, and book banning, that right wing governments like the US are causing today.

The process argument is just wrong too, and that's been addressed by others, but it's still such a weak argument anyways when the service is free and your level of involvement is entirely up to you.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

From this post alone, i don't get why people like this site.

It's like he doesn't understand the point of free software either.