this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
-18 points (28.6% liked)

Fuck AI

7729 readers
2147 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
-18
I Regret Migrating to Codeberg (xn--gckvb8fzb.com)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by thunderousApplaus@sh.itjust.works to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Thought it relevant to this community and posted it to have a discussion on this topic. I am not the author of this blog nor do I endorse the authors views.

Before leaving an upvote or a downvote (a function that IMO should be reserved to posts/comments that are offtopic, made in bad faith or low quality), please first read the blog post.

TL;DR: Author of the blog is criticising Codeberg outright banning LLM and crypto projects. Author thinks this approach is not nuanced enough and introduces censorship to the platform. Author therefore decided to selfhost his projects that the author previously had migrated to Codeberg.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZeroGravitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A free-to-use platform has the right and freedom to define the criteria for its (continued) use. Underneath it all, someone does work on (and pay for) the infrastructure and maintenance, I don't see why they suddenly have 0 say in who they work for just because the enrollment is free.

Every free platform does this.

Otherwise, llmberg.org and coinberg.org are still available as I'm writing this.

[–] thunderousApplaus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If you had read the blog post, you would know that the author is criticising the communication and the methods Codeberg took to combat the harms of slopware, not the general structure or the power that Codeberg holds over its platform.

[–] ZeroGravitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I actually read the article, and the sense of entitlement becomes pretty annoying towards the end. At least the conclusion is correct, I'll give him that.

But I stand by what I said: Codeberg has every right to kick projects off their platform, and they don't need to give their users a say in it.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

I read the blog post and the author seems weirdly defensive about wanting to be a lone Wolf and disagreeing with the specifics of codeberg's decisions on what to disallow, more than anything else.