this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
780 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

22006 readers
566 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A small recompense for decades of jokes at Mexico's expense, eh?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] M137@lemmy.today 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is a valid thing even without the current diarrhea epidemic.
US food is objectively shit, the poor quality and ingredients that are banned almost everywhere else being only some of many reaasons.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I find it funny when people say this, as the US is in the top 5 countries with the safest food worldwide.

[–] PumpUpTheJam@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Bigger they come, harder they fall.

[–] Tabula_stercore@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Hard doubt that the usa would be in front of the 27 EU countries sharing a single food standard.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Chlorinated chicken and hormone loaded beef are banned here in the UK and also the EU, I believe.

We don't chlorinate our chicken because we have standards of cleanliness that don't necessitate it.

You may feel it's safe, but most would not agree. A trade deal with the US that degrades our standards would make me feel nauseous.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

99% of US chicken is no longer chlorinated.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's still washed with hydrogen peroxide. Use of chemicals in EU/UK is prohibited.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works -2 points 15 hours ago

"chlorinated chicken" is chicken that has been rinsed with what's essentially tap water.

Nowadays a mixture of hydrogen peroxide and vinegar is used in appropriately diluted solutions instead of the chlorine/water rinse because of this fear mongering you're displaying. The solution used is appropriately diluted, vinegar is edible, and hydrogen peroxide quickly breaks down into water and oxygen, so I don't know what you're scared of there.

All of these techniques result in about an order of magnitude less foodborne pathogens, when compared to chicken with no treatment.

Stop being afraid of "chemicals". I promise you the "use of chemicals" is not prohibited in the EU/UK, otherwise you'd have Europeans keeling over left and right from various foodborne illnesses.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What is the source for this¿?

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm guessing the Global Food Security Index, which in 2019, had the US ranked 3rd. That's based on a composite score that takes food availability, nutrition, quality, and safety into account.

As of 2022, the index has been updated and the US's composite score puts it at 13th.

Edit: sauce

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

The following parameters are considered for ranking countries in relation to food security:

  1. Nutritional standards

Uhuh. US you say?

And only 113 states?