this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
755 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck AI

7820 readers
1029 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EliteCloneMike@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

No idea why they are saying it’s not reputable. As far as I am aware, it puts out probably some of the most trusted news compared other similar news outlets. Plus it is also one of the least biased news sources out there right now.

From https://guides.emich.edu/WRTG121/evaluating

[–] thrawn21@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is there a newer version of this chart? It's dated from 2018, and things have certainly changed since then.

[–] EliteCloneMike@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh! Looks like there is an interactive version now. It does not seem to be optimized for phone, but Reuters is still roughly in the same spot it was in 2018.

https://app.adfontesmedia.com/chart/interactive

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

One Palestinian genocide whitewashing later and Reuters is still on top...

Question the raters for once.

[–] Physnrd@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks, that's what I understood!

[–] Jivebunny@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

As a non American from a more socialist country: more like Overtonwindowbias.com 😅

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Funny thing is, Infowars is now Onion property.

[–] EliteCloneMike@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yea haha. That is an out of date chart. They have an interactive one (posted in another comment). Though I didn’t check where Infowars falls now.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You're just posting the Propaganda Multiplier but it's the propaganda version of it. These newspapers get their talking points from the US government and will publish whatever they are asked to. This is especially noticeable whenever the US invades a country and lies to manufacture consent for the invasion.

[–] fajitahornet@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You're posting a picture of Swiss Propaganda Research, an anonymous group that spreads conspiracy theories while accusing Swiss media of "one-sided and uncritical" reporting. This falls squarely into what we in Switzerland call Schwurbler territory: people who peddle wild claims like Bill Gates implanting 5G chips through COVID vaccines or "mainstream science" secretly working to enslave humanity. The figure presumably behind SPR, Daniele Ganser, styles himself as a "peace researcher" (a self-invented title with no academic foundation). He was fired from ETH Zurich, where he served as a Senior Researcher, for promoting 9/11 conspiracy myths, and his subsequent teaching positions, including at the University of St. Gallen, were terminated after his theories were deemed damaging to institutional reputation.

https://www.beobachter.ch/multimedia/digital/anonyme-warner-mit-scharfem-s-297308