People Twitter

10282 readers

1185 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

410

Not being a pedophile = feminized mentally warped modernoid gay (suppo.fi)

submitted 3 weeks ago by cm0002@suppo.fi to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] homes@piefed.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Did they actually show any homosexuality in the movie 300?

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, ironically the Spartans in the movie made fun of the Athenians by calling them boy lovers. Which is hilarious considering that Spartan society was way more homosexual than Athenian society.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I always interpreted it as a Spartan preference for grown men over boys.

Like more Freddie Mercury and less Judy Garland, please.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Idk, maybe if there was even a single reference to Spartan homosexuality then maybe. But Spartans were just depicted as beautiful strong who all loved their beautiful strong wives.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The subtext speaks louder than the text in 300.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Lol, I think you might be giving it more credit than it deserves. I'm not sure if there is a lot of subtext in the movie 300. The writing in that movie is pretty minimal and straight forward. It's just a shoddy framework for some interesting (for the time) visual effects.

That is unless you think Zack Snyder was purposely creating media that would fascinate future chuds for years to come. Imo it's just the movie your average 14 year old boy would make in the 00s.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Subtext need not be intentional.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

I couldn't really tell you, I was... distracted.