this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
143 points (99.3% liked)
Fuck AI
7633 readers
572 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't know that your solutions are viable for a lot of companies, but I can believe that it is effective. It appears your situation has a lot more room for what I'll call "decisive choices" that ours. Our company 100% wants to be indexed on every search it can, so blocking most of the official crawlers is out, though I do limit access to only the places we want them to index for anything I can identify as a bot or bot adjacent. As for the vast majority with the bullshit user-agents, historically, heads tend to roll here when blocking content/requests for legitimate users, so while false positives happen, they need to be kept to a minimum. I've had to roll back several mechanisms that somehow ran afoul of edge case users. So I'm open to trying something similar, I won't be able to do it like you are and will probably have far less success as a result. Not that you don't likely already know this, but I believe that if your solution does become more mainstream, many crawlers would probably adapt to simply make more thorough use of sec-fetch-mode and other headers to more believable as a valid client request.