this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
547 points (99.1% liked)

politics

30937 readers
1906 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Wow! Mitch Mcconnell and Lindsey Graham in the same year? The world is indeed slowly starting to heal! Now do Fat Donnie and Erdogone, and I'll throw a party.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Musk, Bebe, Putin and Farage to that mix.

Actually all billionaires too would be nice

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Netanyahu? Thiel? Miller? Schumer? Musk?

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Imagine if they all just croaked though.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Now id assume someone finally got a death note.

[–] decolo@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

I don't count sheep at night, I go over my death note list

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

All in good time.

[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

they are next on the list. I'm becoming like Arya Stark

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Fuck Schumer but it's absolute madness putting him in that list and before Musk. Like listing Hitler, Himmler, Mussolini, Chamberlain, and Stalin.

[–] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Let Putin be the bedraggled old leftovers hopelessly outclassed by their replacements.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

True that's the best outcome for any evil old ruler in terms of actual progreas. But sometimes they come back like Trump and they are often still in the background quietly fucking everything up.

[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Nah man, he deserves worse

[–] bridgeburner@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

McConnell ain't dead yet (unfortunately). Or did I miss something?

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

There's zero proof he is alive.

There's lots of evidence he is dead.

People are just being realistic

[–] s1ndr0m3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I heard that Lindsey Graham is having a 20 minute long conversation with him right now.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's also a strong incentive for the current administration to not announce his death.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They've probably thrown his body off the end of a pier in the middle of the night by now.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

He may be doing guard duty over the Epstein Files right now

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

He's completely absent from everything and if they announce he's dead now they have to have a special election to replace him.

If they wait until 8/3, then the seat just stays empty and whoever gets elected in November gets seated in January:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_Senate_election_in_Kentucky

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The issue is systematic rather than few evil people

[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

True, but a few evil people dying is not so bad.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you're not entirely wrong but not entirely right. there are people who seem to be both causes and symbols of the dysfunction in society. without a few specific evil people, a few specific evils wouldn't have occurred. we'd have different evils, but there's no guarantee they'd be better or worse. the people just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and took advantage of it.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I disagree the system is the set of rule that determine what evil people can do and what they get away with it. The system that allow presidents to get away with war crimes is going to naturally generate more extreme evil people.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

i guess the point i'm trying to make is that a few people are very very effective at what we're calling evil (not entirely sure how broadly we're defining that) and have, due to their positions, shaped the rules of The System to their advantage.

i think we're looking at different ends of The System, though. probably just differences in our experience. some of the rules, yes, function as limitations. some are more aspirational. stuff like research or public service grants. there are a lot of societal functions where charitable organizations are filling the gap left in government services. they often get grants from the government to run said services, in essence making them quasi-governmental corporations.

essentially there's the part of The Rules (both written down and socially implied norms) describing what the folk running the system should be doing if they're acting in good faith. then there's the part punishing people if they aren't engaging with the system in good faith. it all kind of breaks down when a significant portion of the population starts engaging with the system in bad faith, especially if those people are in positions to write or enforce The Rules governing the system.