this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
547 points (99.1% liked)

politics

30930 readers
1874 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 80 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Actually this is massive, massive news. The republican primaries are already over in SC. Given his sudden death likely nobody was prepping a campaign (Graham was already running for re-election). They're gonna have to have a special primary in just a few weeks, and only a few months to build and win a campaign.

Huge huge opportunity for Dems.

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 89 points 1 month ago (5 children)

never underestimate the dems ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 26 points 1 month ago

Oh I said it was an opportunity for them, certainly not that I expected them to capitalize upon it lmao

[–] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If the Dems found a lamp and got three wishes, they'd negotiate down to one wish, and then wish for something they thought the Republicans would want.

Leftists would fight with the genie for not being left enough for them.

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

His opponent was already doing really well.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Given enough time. The short timeframe could actually be a boon.

[–] Sabrinamycarpet@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

awwww, did baby learn a new word and uses it to describe everything now?

cynicism != doomerism

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Lindsey Graham only got 54% last go... It's far from impossible.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's unlikely... But given the negativity across the board for Trump's shit this year resulting in massive shifts in previously pretty strong Trump districts, combined with a baseline of only 54%... It's not an impossibility at all.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Trump helped turn Georgia blue in 2020 and has made it a senatorial swing state. He's more unpopular now

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

This will be the best opportunity, but the last time was a Presidential election, not a mid term. Voter turnout is not the same.

Look at the last mid term election:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_United_States_Senate_election_in_South_Carolina

672,942 - 54.27%
480,933 - 38.78%

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

The latest election in 2020 per your source was 54.44% for Graham and 44.17% for his opponent.

That is not an impossible margin. The Republicans will not benefit from running an incumbent, and the Republican party has never been more unpopular. This is a very good chance.

Just look at Georgia until Osoff and Warnock Georgia had been red for a very very long time. Just as long as South Carolina.

Past elections don't predict future elections. They are certainly indicators, but there's way more to it.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Although a conservative Democrat (and therefore not far off from being a Republican), Fritz Hollings was a senator of South Carolina until 2005.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

i mean back in the day (when i was young and naive. i swear things were really different then though!) conservatives from liberal states and liberals from conservative states had a lot in common. a hell of a lot more than they do now at least.

[–] aproposnix@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago

Huge potential for the DSA.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

And after all that effort to cover up Mitch's death, too.

Republicans in shambles!