this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2026
472 points (98.6% liked)

NonCredibleDiplomacy

844 readers
1 users here now

Shitposting about geopolitics, diplomacy, and current events for shits and giggles

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain bad diplomacy takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong elsewhere.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about international diplomacy. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or talk about military tactics or equipment. There are other places for that.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Please leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NonCredibleDiplomacy exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 49 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

you gotta understand, the alternative was to vote for a woman.

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

AND she's brown!

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Would it really be worse than four years with Trump?

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 3 weeks ago

It's really a toss up, when you think about it

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

She literally campaigned on bombing Iran

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Was that listed in her platform?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

She specifically said that she would "never hesitate to take whatever action necessary to protect US interests from Iran," in addition to promising to ensure the US has "the most lethal military in the world."

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

and continuing the Gaza genocide.

I know, she was another neoliberal tool, better than trump, but we're comparing shit, v toxic shit

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

So what's with the bullshit about it being because she's a woman? Her campaign was horrible, at least trump lied about not starting new wars lol

Americans were starting ww3 regardless of what side they voted for so I kind of understand those who obstained

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've had this conversation so many times. didn't feel like tying the same things over and over,

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There's nothing to be gained from it

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah there's nothing to be gained by claiming sexism when it wasn't the reason she lost

Maga rallies behind tons of women

let's face it, it's both.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Trumplethinskin didn't, but still did

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah and americans are stupid fucks for the most part who believed him. Harris had an easy win and fucked it up for everyone

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The funny part is, this can work for both Harris and Hillary.