this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
534 points (97.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

11781 readers
1842 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ReadyUser31@lemmy.world
aeronmelon@lemmy.world
needanke@feddit.org
534
All the call outs for the past 30 years and only now is it clicking (discuss.online)
submitted 2 days ago by VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
141 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not saying that a thing's label doesn't matter, but there are a couple important facts to keep in mind:

  1. A label is not enough space to fully communicate any idea.
  2. A person's willingness to disagree is not rational.

If I could pretend to be a conservative, uh... pedophile for a moment, what might I say about "climate destabilization"?

  • That's not going to happen; that's ridiculous.
  • We go through seasons and extreme weather all the time—what's "stable" about that?
  • You're some alarmist tree-hugger just trying to scare people, aren't you?
  • If destabilization is so bad, companies would never let it happen. Why would they when they need the planet too?
  • "Destabilization", brought to you by the same irrational, ruled-by-fear people who can't handle an unloaded gun being in the same room as them—heh heh!
  • What does destabilization mean, anyway? Like, one more hurricane a year? Just don't live in Florida.
  • "Oh no! The climate is destabilizing!"—meanwhile in reality, birds are chirping, nothing has changed.
  • Everything "destabilizes"; man makes plans, God laughs.
  • We all have ACs and heaters now anyway, so what's the problem exactly?

All of these bullet points come from the same place: what you're suggesting, that climate change is a problem, is both a lot of difficult effort to solve and very scary to think about. So, emotionally, they just refuse to. It's easier to refuse to. You don't have to live anxiously if you refuse to.

There are a large number of complicated and diverse sociological reasons why climate change isn't taken seriously, and making the label scarier would only really be effective if it represented an across-the-board rhetorical tactic to scare the public into action. That means posters, flyers, ads on television, tv programs and movies, fiction and non-fiction, politicians who will not shut up about it, constant news about the worst-case scenarios and what people watching need to do right now to stop it, companies who pollute being depicted as evil and villainous and a threat to us right now and legally blocked from being allowed to advertise for themselves (e.g. tobacco companies).

Climate change needs strong, inciting propaganda, and for the last 50 years has had very piss-poor propaganda, mostly because money doesn't want it to.

[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 1 points 3 hours ago

The only problem I see with your explanation is that it seems to boil down to defeatism:

  • emotional people are more numerous than rational people
  • emotional people cannot be convinced, any argument will get shot down
  • politicians in any democratic society will follow majority opinion

So... why bother? It's a fight minority cannot win and majority does not consider to be worthwhile or even real.

Also - I honestly hate the american meaning of word "conservative". Conservative should be someone who wants the law of his country to stay as it is, not be changed. Republicans are not conservatives, they are radicals. Conservative is someone who responds to idea like for example "gay marriage" with logic "if this was legal when I was a kid, it should be legal now and in the future".

In my country when you say "organization of pedophiles" we either think Catholics or Americans...