this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
40 points (95.5% liked)

Android

34344 readers
154 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the Android community on Lemmy. Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Crossposted from r/Android

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 16 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Foldable flip phones are an overly complicated solution to a nonexistent problem.

They solve the same problems as the original folding phones. They allow you to keep you phone in your slacks or skirt pocket without destroying the look of your outfit or the screen of your phone.

Slab phones are a disaster for pocket-ability. Yes you can shove it in your back pocket where it looks like ass, breaks your ass when you sit down, and breaks the screen or the phone itself if you sit down in the wrong way or on the wrong thing.

Folding phones solve those problems.

[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe this is just my male privilege, but I have never had a problem putting a slab phone in one of my front pockets, and my wallet in the other.

[–] amelia@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago

Yes, it is definitely male privilege.

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

Women's pants are practically non-existent. I was elated to finally find a phone that can fit in my damn pants. Been on the Z Flip line ever since and I'd be heartbroken to see it go.

Plus whipping it open and closed to answer and disconnect calls is fun AF.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 0 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

With folding phones, you now have a slab half as big and twice as thick. Not really solving too many problems with that form factor.

[–] BoneheadBruin@pawb.social 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

That's actually not the case with the newer folding phones. The Z fold 7 is only 10% thicker (8.9mm) when folded than the s25 ultra (8.2mm), for example. The clamshell flips do run a bit wider at 13mm but they've really come a long way and I'm sad to see the market for them dying.

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Women's pants generally aren't deep enough. So the length of the phone absolutely makes a difference over the thickness in terms of that.

Source: My pants. It had been a frustrating saga over the ever increasing size of smartphones when women's pants pockets weren't expanding to match. Stumbled into the Z Flip line and was hooked. It finally did solve the problem for many of us

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 15 hours ago

If my phone was twice the thickness it'd still be thin. I'd trade space for some extra battery any day, and/or for this.

[–] Overspark@piefed.social 2 points 15 hours ago

It's not though, it's about 1.5 times as thick. And it feels way smaller in your pocket than slab phones do.