this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
58 points (83.0% liked)

politics

30937 readers
1918 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

What's crazy is everyone acting like he was "forced" to do this.

Dude could have 100% just stayed in the race, no one had the authority to make him drop out.

If he was half the monster the media has been wanting us to believe he is, he definitely would have stayed in the race, and no one could have done anything about it.

He got Franklen'd

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 11 points 1 month ago

If he was half the monster the media has been wanting us to believe he is, he definitely would have stayed in the race, and no one could have done anything about it. He got Franklen'd

Franken was not credibly accused of rape and sexual sexual assaults...... Maybe he stopped because if he didn't there would actually be a criminal investigation. You know, because of the crimes?

Just the fact that he re-enlisted twice to go to unjust wars and then signed up to be a mercenary makes him a monster. The rape and Nazi tattoo just adds more fuel to an already burning pile of shit.

many accounts are suddenly showing up on Schumer and Israel's side on this.

People have been saying this shit for over a year. You just claim anyone who disagrees with your terrible takes have fallen for propaganda.

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fuck Schumer, fuck the DNC and fuck all the idiots that thought it was a good idea to run a guy that had a Nazi tattoo on his chest for 18 years as a progressive.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

He was also a guard at Abu Ghraib... during the torture and systematic sexual assaults. And then he joined up with blackwater because he hadn't had enough killing.

But hey! Anti-establishment hero, amirite?!?!? Real shame there was a concentrated smear campaign run on a politician in an important race. Damn you secret establishment cabal!

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

I agree. All my favorite progressives are Blackwater merchandise wearing mercenaries. Lol

[–] GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

He was a guard in the area of Ghraib 2 years after the scandal broke. And you don't get to choose your orders in the military.

Misinformation and botnetting like the establishment did to him reveal a deep rot in our campaign and political system, on top of everything else wrong with it.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee is the Democrats' fundraising arm specifically for Senate races. It has been an entity for more than 100 years.

It's not "what Schumer and the neoliberals still control after losing the DNC." I don't even know what that's supposed to mean.

It's important because it's one of the major three national Democratic Party committees that collect and spend funds on federal-level elections. (Republicans have parallel committees, too.)

Withholding funds from a specific Senate race is a pretty serious step for the party to take.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

It’s not “what Schumer and the neoliberals still control after losing the DNC.” I don’t even know what that’s supposed to mean

I meant they are two distinct organizations:

  1. DNC

  2. DSCC

And that since the neoliberals lost the DNC, they keep acting like the DSCC is important.

Withholding funds from a specific Senate race is a pretty serious step for the party to take.

If you had been asking questions instead of making false statements and waiting for someone to correct you, I'd have linked some resources for how much the DSCC normally pays, and how much the DNC has been paying since the neoliberals got the boot.

Now I'm never going to see any of your comments again instead.