this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
8 points (100.0% liked)

Voyager

8230 readers
27 users here now

The official lemmy community for Voyager, an open source, mobile-first client for lemmy.

Download on App Store

Download on Play Store

Use as a Web App

Download on F-Droid

Rules

  1. Be nice.
  2. lemmy.world instance policy

Sponsor development! πŸ‘‡

Number of sponsors badge

πŸ’™

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi, I'm an ungraceful walrus who keeps fat fingering the menu at the bottom of my screen and interrupting what I'm reading and would love an option to have it be moved to the top thanks.

Pic is what I see instead of the post I'm trying to read when I fatfinger it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xylol@leminal.space 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How do you have a notification from your settings

[–] Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Says my webview is outdated when its not. Some bug with android 9.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Try checking the Webview implementation setting in Android's Developer Options. I had the same problem and it turned out there were two webviews installed and my system was using the extremely outdated one that came with the ROM instead of the modern one from the Play Store.

[–] Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

I'm in the current (I think) Chrome one. Those are the only two options I have. I read it's a bug with android 9/ Galaxy Note 8's not giving the proper identification for the web view or something so it thinks it's wrong.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Are you able to update it from this link? They have an annoying habit of dropping support for older versions of Android so you may be SOL.

Are you running a custom ROM? The webviews you can install on stock ROMs are restricted to specific publishers (usually Google and the phone vendor), but LineageOS adds a few extra accepted certificates for FOSS webviews and some ROMs disable the webview signature verification entirely. You may be able to find a modern version that's installable on Android 9 with some searching.

Edit: the Bromite project is sadly long-dead, but they have an excellent writeup of how it all works here.

[–] Toes@ani.social 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Your os is severely out of date by nearly 5 years.

Plus 138 was dropped about a year ago.

Your device isn't supported at all anymore sadly.

[–] Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I have no interest in being up to date with the AI ridden malware current android versions support. My phone works great as is and has S pen support which custom Roms will break. I'm just going to ride this out until its battery dies.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Back when I used Samsung, the custom ROM scene offered stock ROMs with all the crapware removed - usually labeled as "debloated". If you can find them, those should allow you to update with your S-Pen still working. You can also debloat Android yourself (sort of; without root it just disables packages rather than uninstalling them) using UAB.

You'd lose KNOX though, and a lot of modern apps deliberately break themselves if you're not running pure stock (or spoofing it, which I can help with if you want to go this route).

[–] Toes@ani.social 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I totally respect that take on the matter. I believe its abhorrent that the industry puts people in this scenario in the pursuit of unfettered profit.

I just want to make sure you are aware that by choosing to use a unsupported device you are being exposed to significant threats to your device and your person by extension. With an device that’s been unsupported for as long as yours, it can be trivial for a malicious payload to infect your phone with malware.

Something as simple as visiting a website or even a text message can sometimes be enough to harm you. If you wish to continue using your device it may be wise to purge it of anything sensitive like access to your banking, photos, email, important accounts. I'm not trying to tell you how to use your phone and its very possible you're well aware of all this already.

There are privacy conscious projects out there with the idea of giving you control over the device you own. I'm not aware if this specific example I'm providing is compatible but it is a demonstration of what’s available. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//e/_(operating_system) Something like this won't necessarily solve all your issues (and could cause more like your s-pen comment), but it may help mitigate the low hanging fruit).

[–] Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Thank you, you're right. I'm at risk. I only use this device for Lemmy and Reddit while at work. I only use Firefox with ublock. I don't really install apps anymore. Google Play is a cesspit of adware and malware anyway, even on an updated OS. My main machine is my PC at home.

At some point I will swap over to a pixel with graphene.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

@Toes@ani.social is right about Android 9 being horribly insecure. There are a bunch of unpatched CVEs that can allow an attacker full access to your phone, and since even browsers have dropped support for it you're going to be lacking protection from modern attack vectors.

If you only use your phone to browse a couple of websites, going into uBlock's settings and disabling JavaScript will provide extra protection against malware. When you want to allow a site through, just click the uBlock icon and enable JavaScript for the site in the pop-up, then hit the padlock (to save it as a rule instead of being temporary) and refresh.

It's like NoScript except it doesn't require another add-on and it's much easier to use. The downsides are that the control isn't as fine-grained and it's slightly less secure (as it's a binary allow/block for everything on the site, whereas NoScript lets you block individual scripts and third-party domains) - I don't think it'll protect you from a trusted site that's been infected with malware itself. If you're comfortable with nearly every site being broken without manual intervention, go with NoScript instead for the extra security.

There are also anti-malware filter lists in uBlock's settings. I can't recall if they're enabled by default, but it's worth checking. They're a simple change that provide excellent protection on their own.

[–] Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

Thank you, I'll do that.

[–] diffaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You should try the voyager's webapp version. Im using it with peel and its working better!

[–] Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago

Oh! I've never heard about Peel before. This is really cool! Thank you!