this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
391 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

21915 readers
547 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

So.... become the head of security for a billionare, got it.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A consultant reported that billionaires, when confronted with the idea that the private security team have no incentive to continue to obey the billionaire once society had collapsed, asked the consultant how they could maintain control of the security team, such as if shock collars or locking up all the food would work.

The consultant suggested they simply treat the security team really well beforehand, like just being a good friend.

The billionaires then became concerned, and I shit you not, asked "but where does that end?"

I'll try to find the link to add it here.

Edit: Here it is.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 6 points 1 day ago

Simply treat the security team really well beforehand, like just being a good friend.... billionaires then asked “but where does that end?”

This is how you know they have become a net detriment to society. This is why they believe so strongly in things like "return to office" "no UBI" and poverty level minimum wages.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

They usually hire ex special forces for that role

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah..... No billionaire knows how to exist without exploiting labour. They aren't going to be going into their bunkers without security, chefs, cleaners, or entertainers. There's so much cognitive dissonance required to simultaneously believe that the government/world is going to be destroyed, but you will safe and still have a legal right to property.

The only thing that maintains their wealth is the legal and economic system they use to exploit other people's work. Without it their property is just going to be seized by the first person who is quicker on the draw.

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean I'm about a billion dollars short of being a billionaire, and I don't know how to live without exploiting labor either. I can't farm, I can't hunt, I can't identify edible berries, roots, and mushrooms, I can't sew beyond fixing a button. I know a lot about mechanisms, but it's far from clear to me I could do anything useful in that field once the electricity is out, let alone once source metal starts getting hard to find. Everything would get so much harder so quickly. Hell, I don't even know how to dig a latrine that'll prevent the water supply from being contaminated, assuming we can find a water supply. (On the plus side, sources of pollution in water supplies should start to fall apart pretty fast.)

I dunno. I just think everyone thinking about the collapse wildly underestimates how hard everything will be. I can't really picture my sorry ass lasting long at all.

Eh... There's a difference between utilizing or societally benefiting someone else's labour and exploiting someone for their labour. Exploitation in an economic sense generally requires you to capitally monopolize a persons excess production value for personal gain. You can't really be considered exploitive unless you own the means of production. Basically unless you are a business owner or employ someone you aren't really participating in capitalism in an exploitive manner.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Have you seen billionaires' wives? I'll pass

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Oh I wouldn't care for the wife so much, in fact I'd likely throw her out as well, but a free fully stocked doomsday bunker sound pretty nifty.