this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
99 points (98.1% liked)

Gaming

4980 readers
102 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He argues that AI tools are just tools, and that developers that use them shouldn't be penalized.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It has no effect on rankings it literally just shows a tag to the user. If a customers response to the presence of that tag is not to buy the product, doesn't that represent some sort of cultural problem that should concern a CEO, rather than complaining about the presence of the feature?

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

I would argue for a "Publishers are arseholes" tag, along with other ones like "Studio got closed", "fired most of the developers"

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No no, you don't get it. Consumers are fine with medium doses of AI, we just have to cover it up and don't tell them.

This is important because then as a CEO I get to keep my cake and eat it too - I don't have to pay workers to make games, and still charge for them as if I had actual costs.

This moronic valve policy is gonna kill our golden egg chicken!

Perspective above brought to you by the average asshole CEO.