this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
99 points (98.1% liked)

Gaming

5091 readers
314 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He argues that AI tools are just tools, and that developers that use them shouldn't be penalized.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oce@jlai.lu 71 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So EPIC brand = AI tag, got it.

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 18 points 1 month ago

Pretty much. They also welcomed nft games with open arms when Steam banned them lol

[–] TrippyHippy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I know you can ignore a game on steam, can we set it to ignore a publisher and all of their offerings?

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 58 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well that's one way to to scare away the minority of users you still have on your platform...

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wonder what 5 people ACTUALLY use epic games. Like how unaware would one need to be?

I don't know of a single person that does anything more than getting those free games every week. My library has like 20 pages but all of it is those free games lol.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Some people are simply platform agnostic or prefer to use platforms that offers the biggest cut for the studios they like. There are dedicated library mangers for that:

[–] AngryMob@lemmy.one 2 points 1 month ago

Fortnite and whatever random exclusives are trapped there, but yeah nobody chooses to use it by choice.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It has no effect on rankings it literally just shows a tag to the user. If a customers response to the presence of that tag is not to buy the product, doesn't that represent some sort of cultural problem that should concern a CEO, rather than complaining about the presence of the feature?

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

I would argue for a "Publishers are arseholes" tag, along with other ones like "Studio got closed", "fired most of the developers"

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No no, you don't get it. Consumers are fine with medium doses of AI, we just have to cover it up and don't tell them.

This is important because then as a CEO I get to keep my cake and eat it too - I don't have to pay workers to make games, and still charge for them as if I had actual costs.

This moronic valve policy is gonna kill our golden egg chicken!

Perspective above brought to you by the average asshole CEO.

[–] Dionysus@leminal.space 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Tim Sweeney is a cunt.

The More You Know

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

He seems to set a timer and make sure he reminds people about that at least once a month.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 1 month ago

Not exactly TIL material.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

If people don’t care about AI, then it won’t be a big deal, Tim.

[–] jontree255@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Holy shit shut the fuck up Tim.

[–] nightmare786@leminal.space 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i hate steam as much as the next drm-hater but this is... actually... surprisingly responsible

[–] artyom@piefed.social 18 points 1 month ago

Valve could probably do a lot more to protect gamers but also they are actually very good about requiring disclosures that they absolutely don't have to have, like third party accounts, Denuvo, EULA, kernel anti-cheat, etc.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

I agree with you on DRM, but it is worth noting that Value is a rare case where despite having a dominant market position, they continue to offer and improve the best client experience.

Not without missteps of course, but there are nowhere near as bad as Microsoft, Google, Apple, etc.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

This guy is so out of touch with reality

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't like Epic Games view on AI, while I agree AI is a tool I feel like for the most part it's pretty unethical (especially when it's trained on everything)

[–] runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

If transparency = penalty then you are doing shady shit.

[–] gila@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

I'd assume Sweeney would know that user tags and steam curators are a thing, but then again EGS doesn't have users

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

Is he just worried that now Epic will be expected to do the same, and that not doing so will harm Epic's market share (which itself is probably already in the toilet)?

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

Sweeny sucks, dont give your money to epic.

[–] HairyTeeth@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

If Tim Sweeny told me the sky was blue, I would, At the very least, double check.