this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
173 points (96.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48573 readers
1273 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 63 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (7 children)

The way blackmailing works is, the blakmailer threatens the blackmailee to reveal their secrets.

Trump's secrets are already out there: he's a convicted rapist and his name appears more than a million times in the unredacted Epstein files - i.e. if he's not a fucking pedo, I'm the King of England. No blackmailer has anything on him that everybody doesn't already know.

So no.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

The thing is, there’s no public smoking gun evidence that would put him away for a long time. I think the fact that the unredacted Epstein files haven’t been released means that the evidence does exist, and the oligarchs are using that to manipulate policy. It’s likely policy that Trump himself already wants because he can profit off of it, but I do think there is kompromat out there that is being used.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

You don't think there's maybe Israeli or Russian ... or even CIA dossiers on Epstein/Trump, that include say, very explicit and direct photos or videos of Trump doing extremely illegal things to children...

... you know, the kind of things its Kash Patel's job to censor and deny?

Epstein was basically into 'triple agent' territory, where he had so many allegiances and connections that he essentially had to start playing the intel game for himself, as himself.

To me it seems highly likely that much of the information on/around Epstein exists within Mossad, the FSB... they probably have a lot of the same stuff as what the FBI has, but of course, they have their own decision making process for what they would or would not publicize, deny, censor, etc.

[–] Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.world 30 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (4 children)

Do you not realize, that there could be worse things out there of him? Unreleased and unredacted.

[–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Do you think there is anything unknown at this point that'd actually make a difference? Even saying Trump could rape a child live on Fox News wouldn't hurt him is old hat now. I don't buy into the idea that his voter base and staff will magically grow a conscience in response to...anything. The people opposed to him, is there something that gets them to actually organise and do something about the rot? I'm on the outside looking in so idk.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 32 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, there's a fair chance that he might be a murderer also. That's also out there.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

And not a single voter will care.

[–] svdasein@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think the problem is that the fraction of people you're referring to absolutely would care had they not been basically trained to reflexively dismiss claims of wrongdoing against "daddy" as "fake news". History is probably going to say trump was probably the most effective con man the world has ever seen.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t think so. Trump is undoubtedly a con man. However, I think it’s going to be studies about the media and misinformation channels that dominate history books. Trump doesn’t have psychological insight. He acts on impulse and is a compulsive liar and narcissist. It’s how he was portrayed and how social media, in particular “engagement” driving views and clicks that will be studied. Obviously, the owners of these channels realised the power of the algorithm, just like previous oligarchs realised the value of newspapers and tv stations. It just became more hidden and personalised how we were being manipulated.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

A guy held a sign in support of a Reform candidate in the UK saying he'd rather have Jimmy Saville than the other candidates and Reform voters are saying it's AI. Reform is one of the fascist parties (and ahead in the polls).

[–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

i think if theres actual footage of him doing these things, tides turn quickly.

[–] Elaine@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

You mean firing up the disinformation machine? Yes.

Just think of all the videos of people being murdered by police and the ICE thugs, it wont amount to anything.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

So far he’s shown no sense of shame or even that his victims are people, and his followers don’t seem to care

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Do you not realize that anyone who doesn't care about everything we already know, is just going to continue to not care?

[–] Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Do you not realize that there were so many pages redacted, and it wasn't just the victims?

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Trump voters dont care if they are redacted or not. He is a cult leader. They will drink the kool aid because theyre narcissistics

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I'm sure of it. The people who are going to care, already do, his sycophants will continue to support him NO MATTER WHAT.

[–] Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

True, evil people with money and money talks apparently.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

If you’re being blackmailed you also need to be worried about the consequences of the information being revealed, like legal consequences.

Trump dgaf about any of that, nobody's prosecuting him for the existing things he’s done.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 15 hours ago

Trump’s secrets are already out there: he’s a convicted rapist and his name appears more than a million times in the unredacted Epstein files

They have pictures and videos of him raping and torturing small children. Possibly even eating them, if some rumors are true.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 5 points 18 hours ago

I think he might be too narcissistic (and stupid) for blackmail. First off, he’d lie to the blackmailers and regardless, he’d tell somebody else about it. He is the proverbial chess pigeon.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Not many people with first hand knowledge and nobody prominent has revealed incontrovertible facts though. Anyone with half a brain who isn't obsessed with his pumpkin-painted dumb face knows he is guilty, of course, considering he said he was "best friends" with JE during JE's most unrestrained period. But still millions of people think there's no evidence, and the admin is still suppressing over 3 million documents and redacted the rest to hell.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 5 points 18 hours ago

Well, like I said previously, since it's just about impossible for ordinary folks to get the Epstein files released in full, we should all default to assuming all those mentioned in it are guilty - and since all those fuckers are rich and powerful and they can get the files released, if they want their names cleared, they can jolly well demand the release of the exculpatory evidence themselves.

And what's blindingly obvious, starting with the one pedo who's most mentioned in the files, is that they're not exactly rushing to demand that the truth be set free...