this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
10 points (91.7% liked)

Asklemmy

54645 readers
511 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think i've only once flat out told one it was wrong about a specific assertion I quoted and it immediately was able to find its way to what I knew to be the correct claim.

I just wonder what would happen if i was in fact mistaken and I told it confidently it was wrong without elaborating

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Give it a shot. They're just sycophantic stochastic parrots anyway.

[–] tourist@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

damn, you're right

immediately folded and apologised on the first message

I don't know why it needed to "think" about that for three seconds

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 10 hours ago

"Thinking" means it talked to itself for a while. I expect you can expand the "thinking" by clicking on it.

Now ask it why it’s apologizing