Main, home of the dope ass bear.
THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)
(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)
A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!
Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!
State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership
Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources
Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)
Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with
Main Source for Feminism for Babies
Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide
Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow
view the rest of the comments
I'm disappointed to see apologia here for this particular, concrete implementation of deprescribing. Nothing good will come from this.
To me it seems intuitive that pathologies are generally not universal conditions of a universal human mind but are historically situated like the rest of subjective experience, and that the DSM is a deeply political text - and that changes not one goddamn thing about the fact that this deprescribing is yet another weaponization of the US medical system as-fucking-always.
Of all the times and places to philososophize about how some imaginary, better version of US healthcare with no connection to reality would involve fewer medications, this is among of the most foolish, or else the most violently bigoted. As we dismantle the remnants of our welfare state, am I going to see some
on here equivocating about how, since it was a liberal welfare state, its dissolution might actually be a good thing for the people losing food and housing?