this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
578 points (99.7% liked)

politics

30062 readers
2144 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“While Susan Collins’ campaign is backed by billionaire donors, our campaign is built on a movement funded by the people, with an average donation of $26,” said Graham Platner’s campaign manager.

A new analysis of campaign finance data shows that nearly 100 billionaires and their spouses have contributed to Republican Sen. Susan Collins’ reelection bid so far, funneling nearly $10 million to the incumbent’s campaign committee and PACs supporting her effort to fend off progressive challenger Graham Platner.

The Maine Monitor on Thursday published a list of billionaires who have donated to Collins and Platner, who has called his Republican opponent a “corrupt” protector and beneficiary of an oligarchic political system.

The outlet noted that Collins’ billionaire donation total “stands in stark contrast with the fundraising of her opponent... whose campaign has mostly attracted smaller amounts of funds but from many more people.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now you're just demonstrably lying:

https://ballotpedia.org/Jill_Stein_presidential_campaign,_2016/Russia

Jill Stein (G) said that she viewed Russians "not as enemies to conquer or resources to exploit, but as members of the global community whom we must deal with." She recommended that the U.S. "encourage Ukraine to be neutral" so that Russia would not "feel under attack."

https://www.thirdway.org/memo/jill-stein-a-russian-asset-and-a-hypocrite

"In 2015, Stein “recorded a video from Moscow’s famous Red Square, in which she talked about ‘the need to rein in American exceptionalism’ and replace ‘a U.S. policy based on domination’—words that sounded like they were ripped from Putin’s talking points.” – POLITICO (June 20, 2017). During the campaign of 2016, Stein “parroted the Russian position on Ukraine and criticized the U.S. for installing a government in Kiev ‘hostile to Russia.’” – NBC News (Dec. 22, 2018)

She still sounds like a Russian propagandist: “Russia’s invasion was a provoked response to the bigger, more murderous and illegal game plan of US empire… In 2014 the US backed a coup in Ukraine led by far-right insurrectionists. The installation of the new government was a giant step towards the goal of adding Ukraine to NATO - and putting hostile bases and nuclear-capable missiles right on Russia's border.” – Jill Stein (Feb. 24, 2022)"

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

showing quotes where she's not criticizing Russia isn't proof she doesn't criticize Russia. she called the invasion illegal.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And repeatedly parroted Putin calling Ukraine the aggressor. LOL.

Like if I break into your house and call you the bad guy.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if she's ever done that, you could prove this. she has never said that, though.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Literally 3 comments ago... Here, let me make it easier for you:

https://ballotpedia.org/Jill_Stein_presidential_campaign,_2016/Russia

She recommended that the U.S. "encourage Ukraine to be neutral" so that Russia would not "feel under attack."

Putin talking point.

https://www.thirdway.org/memo/jill-stein-a-russian-asset-and-a-hypocrite

she talked about ‘the need to rein in American exceptionalism’ and replace ‘a U.S. policy based on domination’

Putin talking point.

parroted the Russian position on Ukraine and criticized the U.S. for installing a government in Kiev ‘hostile to Russia.

Putin talking point.

“Russia’s invasion was a provoked response to the bigger, more murderous and illegal game plan of US empire… In 2014 the US backed a coup in Ukraine led by far-right insurrectionists. The installation of the new government was a giant step towards the goal of adding Ukraine to NATO - and putting hostile bases and nuclear-capable missiles right on Russia's border.”

Putin talking point.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

she never called Ukraine the aggressor, no matter how big you make your text

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because non-aggressors are well known for wanting to attack. 🤣

You're twisting yourself in a pretzel trying to avoid the obvious.

Over and over Stein parroted Putin talking points, which is why the Russians helped her and why she was at dinner with Putin.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

she never said Ukraine wanted to attack, either. you're the one doing the twisting.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Who ELSE has Russia invaded because they stated the victim was being the aggressor?

Look, I know your name is "Commie" but you have a serious blind spot here.

So when Stein said:

https://uawire.org/news/jill-stein-the-us-helped-foment-a-coup-in-ukraine-where-ex-nazis-came-to-power

“We should encourage Ukraine to be neutral; we helped foment a coup against a democratically-elected government, [resulting in a government] where ultra-nationalists and ex-Nazis came to power.”

“So let's not be single-issue--instead of fomenting a hostile Ukraine we should be leading the way in establishing a neutral Ukraine that would allow Russia to not feel under attack,” Stein added.

That isn't JUST Russian propoganda, those are direct talking points from Putin.

But at this point you personally are a lost cause at this point, it's been proved over and over again in this thread. This is purely a reply for posterity so anyone searching your history can bear witness to how thoroughly owned you are on this topic.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

russia may say Ukraine is the aggressor, but Stein never has

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Quotes above. You're dissembling now. Congrats! Logged for posterity!

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago

she didn't call ukraine an aggressor. dissembling is a great word for what's happening here.