Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
So, there's reasons why "ethical investing" doesn't work well in practice, but this isn't really one of them. Industries enjoy a networking effect and efficiencies of scale. Lowering the investing costs of a target industry will naturally improve their growth prospects. And a rising stock price can lure in growth-focused future investors, because investment cash is often dumb and prone to following trends rather than raw performance metrics.
If Good Guys Banking plans to throw $50B into solar panels over five years, that will drive up the price of solar stocks, drive down the cost of solar panels, and proliferate the number of installers and maintenance techs, all of which improve the long term economic prospects of the sector. Neutral investors will want to beat Good Guys Banking to these stocks (accelerating growth of these companies, employment in the field, etc). Retail customers will see more advertising, more local retail sales, and more of their peers getting panels installed, which will induce more spending. And competitors will seek to diversify into Solar in order to capture these gains.
Your real problem is that you're not a bank with $50B in investing cash to toss around, much less the sophistication to know which solar companies stand the most to benefit from the sudden infusion.
Definitely also good choices. But for the same reasons. Local investment has the double-benefit of ramping up your local economy and providing yourself and your neighbors with more privatized amenities. But it is also riskier. If your neighborhood goes into a downturn, you're both at risk of unemployment AND big investment losses.
Self-investment has the same problems, only magnified. You're putting all your eggs in one basket. It's also much more of a tax on your time, as spending more on your own business means managing more assets and staff directly. If you don't see profit in this investment, what you're doing isn't going to compound your savings.
Thanks to both!
Could you say a bit more on this?
Very difficult for an outside investor to gauge the ethical practices of a business outside the broad brush stuff (war bad, solar good, etc)
The volume of cash you're investing is likely a rounding error on a rounding error for the business, nevermind the industry as a whole, so you're unlikely to shift behaviors with your choices
Ethical investing is riff with affinity scams.