this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
86 points (97.8% liked)

Not The Onion

21688 readers
1002 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Also not the Bloomin' Onion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 80 points 1 day ago (19 children)

I'm hesitant to say this is silly. It reminds me of the McDonald's hot coffee incident.

For those unaware, in that case a woman had coffee spilled on her, and she sued saying it was "too hot". What is lesser known about it was:

  • McDonalds frequently kept coffee at near boiling temperatures to keep it longer
  • McDonalds had been warned numerous times that this was extremely unsafe and that it was going to hurt someone
  • The woman's labia was fused shut because the coffee was so hot it melted her underwear and caused permanent scarring
  • McDonalds is heavily thought to have caused the smear campaign against her to protect their image, shifting blame and making her out to be an idiot who was only looking for a payday.
  • The woman was asking only for McDonalds to cover her medical bills in her lawsuit.

So jumping out ahead of this one, it seems like she's an idiot, but history tells us that corporations are very cunning and quick to blame the victim.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree, it's not a silly story, in spite of the headline. I do hope that people are inspired to read it.

FWIW the rules right now don't mention criteria for articles, just for the headlines. I would be on board for stricter standards in article content, if that's what the comm wants though.

[–] Harelipsteve@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I read the article and as someone who is chronically dumb, when I slip on something I don’t fall face first. It’s more of a prat fall and I wing up on my ass.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Congratulations. Not everyone is you.

load more comments (16 replies)