this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
680 points (98.6% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

16970 readers
108 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Can anyone tell this meme is true or false? I don't have Gspy so I cannot test this

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Didn't Fairphone or some other Linux phone maker include switches in some relatively recent model?

EDIT: According to (embarrassed for having to mention source) Google's AI summary, yes:

  • Murena 2: Features a dedicated physical privacy switch that physically cuts the circuit for the microphone and camera.

  • Purism Librem 5: Offers physical toggle switches on the side of the phone to mechanically sever power to the microphone, camera, and baseband.

-Pine64 PinePhone: Includes built-in hardware DIP switches under the back cover that allow you to completely disconnect the mic, cameras, and modems.

[–] krigo666@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have /e/OS on my Fairphone 6 and the switch turns off camera and microphone. Of course this is software, but better than nothing.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

Only marginally, IMHO - software is vulnerable to remote hacks, but physically breaking the electrical connection is pretty effing hard to overcome remotely.

[–] JohnDarlen@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

Man at least use some open source or European AI, like Qwen, Deepseek, Mistral.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Could you be a bit more specific - is what true?

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

More context, the proportion of inaccurate summaries is high enough I limit my trust of it to something like jogging my memory on something I already know. I might make more searches based on it as well.

I ensure I never spread summaries unless I recognize their factuality - I recall a time I was asked a question, asked a state of the art model to explain the situation surrounding the question, read through the answer, and shared the answer 1:1 with a disclaimer that every word matched my understanding.

Some are MUCH more critical than me!:

screenshot of above linked post

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Is that a copy paste from the automated summary at the top of Google results? Wondered if those bullet points are true