this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
117 points (98.3% liked)

World News

56299 readers
2398 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Great and informative comment. I'm far from an expert in the subject but it was my understanding a current theory is that the language "comes" from Siberia, but that it is not completely accepted. Am I wrong?

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wait which language? The Urheimat of Uralic languages definitely looks to be the ural mountains region that is taken as the western edge of siberia. As with genetics, the area of greatest diversity is almost always the origin point. That doesn't always hold, and mountains tend to preserve diversity, but it's definitely the only strong contender.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, I didn't mean to be unclear. My comment formed in the beginning of the original comment. I was regering to Finno-Ugric.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh! Yeah finno-ugric as a seperate branch probably developed west of siberia.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But rooted I Siberia or not. Related to Korean or not. Now I'm just curious about your oppinon. :)

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 1 points 5 days ago

Ok, firstly i'm not a linguist, or any other kind of expert. I'm an enthusiast, I have an ancient history degree and my parents are linguists. I would also love to hear your take on these questions!

Related to Korean - i think the only honest answer is "there's insufficient evidence to claim that". But i do think it's possible. Like a lot of long-ranger theories it's like - yeah maybe, but if so further back in time than the comparative method can go. The seimo-turbino related connection to korea is pretty well disproved i believe - the weapons are later and different enough that it's almost certainly much later chinese iterations moving into korea.

But i vaguely remember hearing some ancient dna stuff that suggested links. But siberia like the wider steppe seems to be such a soupy interaction zone, i dunno if there'll ever be evidence enough to puzzle out what's areal and what's genetic (linguistically) with certainty.

As for rooted in siberia, i could believe that there were pre-proto-finno-ugric communities west of the urals who expanded further west in the early bronze age - population expansion likely occurs sometime before linguistic differentiation, right? Since Proto-FU seems younger than Samoyedic it seems likely to me that FU ultimately stems from siberia, even if it developed as a seperate branch west of the urals.

What's your understanding though, what do you think about it?