this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
249 points (98.4% liked)

Fuck AI

7118 readers
1758 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world -3 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

It's a lost cause on here, as soon as you made a comment that wasn't immediately and clearly anti-AI you're going to get dogpiled with bad faith arguments and downvotes.

The irony of people commenting in a post promoting human writing while also failing to understand basic concepts of writing, such as irony.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I assume you went to the "ten thousand spoons when all you need is a knife"* school of irony?

Irony typically requires the things to be equivalent. AI writing is not equivalent to human writing, a private website is not slack and a comment about the detriments of AI is not equivalent to a work chat. The only common element would be essays, and they weren't the subject of criticism.

And even then, the page isn't nearly the same style as the essays they're complaining about.

Maybe it's a reading comprehension issue? Should probably ask some LLM to pick out the core points, maybe it'll do a better job.

--

*Alanis Morissette, Ironic, a song that contains as many good examples of irony as bad ones

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 35 minutes ago

It's an anti-essay essay, it was obvious that they were making a surface level joke if you're not looking for reasons to be outraged.

It should have been very clear to you what they meant, since the person clarified what they meant 8 hours before your comment and that comment was, literally, 2 comments under mine.

It is hypocritical, bordering on ironic, to condescend about reading comprehension while ignoring the very thread you are participating in.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I mean can pro-AI comments at least make sense?

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

People not finding someone writing an essay in response to being annoyed at people sending them irrelevant essays funny is acceptable enough to me. I don't care if people don't share my humor. The absolute wall of defensive text I've received in response is also funny, in a discussion about an essay about the value of brevity. And so is the idea that any of this is pro AI. I can also assure you the irony of how much I've typed is also not lost on me. Frankly this thread is about to produce a singularity of irony.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh there's plenty of funny stuff going on and it's not like the downvotes matter. I mean that guy using Socratic irony to tell my why I found something ironically funny was wrong was amusing in itself if incredibly tedious.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world -2 points 23 hours ago

It's irony all the way down