this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
313 points (98.5% liked)

World News

56225 readers
1831 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Because they were bad people.

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Where they, though? People drafted and sent to the front generally have few options. I get that people dying is what happens in war but casting all individual soldiers of one side as "bad", of the other as "good" just serves to dehumanise people and excuse atrocities.

This was a legitimate military target, but I don't think anyone should cheer about a hundred dead people.

[–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

I doubt FSB workers are your typicl cannon fodder draftee.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Of course we should. Russians elected their leaders, followed and cheered them for decades and supported most of their decisions including this war. Don't get fooled into thinking Russians are just poor, innocent people send to war by their mad leader. It's an underdeveloped, sick country that uses violence and terror to get what they want. They got what they deserved.

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Demonising a whole people like this is in itself wrong.

What is your supposed solution, then? How does one deal with tens of millions of people who are supposedly evil and wrong?

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

This is the paradox of tolerance in action.

I'm sorry, but the sooner you understand this the better; death is a natural part of life, and life does not always have intrinsic value.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

You take away their ability to harm others. In this case you destroy their ability to wage wars. You sanction the shit out of them so that they don't have enough money to arm themselves and you destroy whatever military they have now. No one is proposing extermination, they just have to become harmless. When they are civilized enough to re-join the international community they are welcomed to do so.

[–] Zabjam@feddit.org 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

And what's the difference between that and the approach that was taken with Germany after WW1, which was a contribution to the rise of the Nazis?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 7 hours ago

The difference would be that if they start growing their army again we would do a preemptive strike, not just sit and watch.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 0 points 9 hours ago

After WW1 Germany was made the scapegoat for the whole war because they lost. It's not like they actually had aggressively started WW1 but they were treated as if, which was way too much and german people felt treated unfairly rightfully.

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I would argue that those sanctions, if general, shouldn't include necessities like food or medicine. Also, I feel that sanctions against specific figures in the government might be relatively effective (many countries are doing this already). Make it difficult to enjoy the fortune they stole from their people.

I also don't like the idea of sanctions that aren't based on specific/ongoing actions, but the existence of a certain government/regime, though I see where you are coming from.

I would also still argue that the Russian people chose that government because they didn't see many other options, and keeping them in perpetual destitution long term isn't likely to change that.