Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Job was suffering as a test, when the test was over, his wealth was doubled. Jesus Christ was not a creation, he was always there.
Jesus had faith, and yes, Jesus descended into Hell for his battle with death, and rose victorious onto our mortal world 3 days later, and was transfigured into Heaven. And Jesus Christ was not born with original sin, as Mary was the virgin mother, who had been chosen by God. And
God may sometimes directly speak to you, when it is a dire situation, but He usually has many other ways to speak to you, and direct speech with God is extremely rare.
Please give Catholicism a try, Prototestantism is not the fullness of the Faith, and many who do not like it, leave Christianity as a whole.
The test was, in my humble opinion, bullshit, which Job correctly pointed out. His family was killed to win a bet with Satan, a bet that God didn't have to take on since he knew the outcome already from being all knowing. A bet with an entity that he created and has power over, and should have nothing to prove anything to, or at the very least he could just pull that "Don't question me bro" stuff on Satan himself and spare Job all the suffering and needless death of his family. God teaches us that material wealth is ultimately meaningless, yet uses it as a reward for justification for his torture. If any human did that same test on another, we'd call them a monster and lock them up.
Yeah, like I said, Jesus was the only thing that seemed to make God stop directly fucking with us in so many horrific ways, since he realized how much it sucked once he actually experienced it himself from our perspective (which an all knowing being shouldn't need to do, lending more credence that he isn't all knowing).
The baby thing: That's very clumsy way of dealing with the baby problem. Your screenshot literally says "we don't know how, but the babies will make it since God is loving!" That's what I'd call a Deus Ex Machina, because the alternative would make God seem so unbelievably cruel and evil that we have to assume that all the rules the Church came up with don't apply in those situations. By the same logic, we can start to assume that God may bend the rules for all sorts of things that would otherwise seem cruel to us; Gay family members who were otherwise very good people, uncontacted tribes, people/family who went to other denominations, unbelievers that are really moral otherwise, the billions of people who were born and died before Christianity was invented, etc. It's a get out of jail free card to smooth over the nasty bits.
Buuut.... that solution does unfortunately bring us back to the baby killin' problem: if God makes exceptions for unbaptized babies, then really the most logical thing would be for every single parent in the world to commit infanticide to ensure they get into heaven, as letting them grow up gives them the chance to lose faith and sin, resulting in burning in agonizing hell for literal eternity. Under those rules, killing at birth or with abortion is clearly the safest option to save your loved ones and deprive Satan of more souls. And the parents doing the killing would still be able to get into heaven by asking for forgiveness before they themselves died. Obviously actually doing that would be heinous and insane, but technically only from the perspective of a non-believer, since a believer could quite reasonably believe they're saving as many people as possible from eternal torture.
You'd think someone losing faith would be one of those times where direct speech would be opted for. But your answer also means that yes, all those people claiming to have casual conversations with God and Jesus on how to fix their marriage were indeed lying or delusional (and if delusional, then they are very unlucky that they were also born into the wrong denomination, as that delusion will ensure that they never question if they are in the wrong religion)
If I were to somehow desire to become religious again, I can't say the denomination that most consistently covered for and enabled pedophiles would be the most appealing, not to mention the long history of corruption and exploitation of people's fears for their dead family members within the Catholic church (I know the rest of the video is about the Church of England, I only refer to the beginning of the video that talks about the Catholic church).
And I'd like to ask you this: How did you determine that the Catholicism was the best and most correct denomination?
When you were old enough to understand critical thinking and had a good grasp of world history, did your parents sit you down and say "Alright, here's some research material on all the world religions covering their differences, practices, history, beliefs, etc. Take some time to go through each one, and see which speaks to you the most before deciding", or, as I suspect is more likely, did your parents teach you their own inherited religion at a young age, one that happened to also be popular in your region of the world already?
If it's the latter; isn't it a little convenient that the one true religion that will actually get you into heaven happened to be the one that's native to your geographic area, and your parents just so happened to be raised in that one true religion too?
But how can one truly know their particular religion is the one true one out of hundreds, when the followers of every single one report that God has talked to them, and they feel absolutely convicted in their feelings that they are in the correct religion, despite each one laying claim to being the only correct one? Is every other religious person deceiving themselves, or is that feeling of God that they have communicated with a Satanic being?
As an example, there are currently around 2 billion muslims on earth, about 25% of the population, all of which are Muslim because their parents were Muslim. 99% of those people will die as Muslims, which means God created a world in which billions upon billions of people, regardless of how good they were on earth, will burn for eternity because they were unlucky enough to be born in the wrong geographic area, to the wrong culture, all the while fully convinced that they will make it into heaven. I can not imagine such a supposedly loving God creating such a cosmically horrific scenario. If that scenario were described in a fantasy book, we would assume they are the villain.
And another issue; You mentioned that praying is only effective, or able to alter things, if it is in God's will. That brings with it some very troubling thoughts. It's safe to assume that most of the prisoners in Unit 731 were religious, some of them Catholic. Surely they must've prayed to God for protection from the horrific experiments subjected to them, yet all prisoners were experimented on and killed.
Likewise, it is probable that countless Jews prayed to God to spare them the horrific deaths they would experience during the holocaust. Yet millions were killed horrifically regardless.
One can only conclude then, that all of that torture and all of those deaths were, in fact, God's will. This is a difficult pill to swallow, which is likely why so many believers can only offer the "He works in mysterious ways, it is unknowable" handwave, quickly absolving Him so we need not suffer the pain of the cognitive dissonance which would come from actually grappling with those thoughts.
Material Wealth is meaningless, but Job literally went to Heaven afterwards. The times before Christ were harsh, you had to pay for EVERY SINGLE sin.
No, Jesus died for our sins, so we could live a life free of sin. We no longer have to pay for every single sin as it has already been paid.
Sometimes, God will speak to you through his Voice, sometimes through other things. It depends on Him.
Do not let Judas guide you away from Satan. Pope Leo has released multiple statements on this.
and satan is responsible for the false visions and voices in the heads of people, or it could just be schizophrenia
and we literally do not know most things like we DONT KNOW we cannot know everything
and hell is not eternal fire and burning, but literally just the abyss, where you dont exist, youre dead, because you cant have eternal torture without eternal life first, and you cant have eternal life without Christ, where you wont go to the abyss.
And I unfortunately had little to no spiritual guidance from my parents as a child, so yes, I researched the Christian faith, I was protestant for a while before discovering Catholicism and its teachings, then I chose.
I know of multiple people who are Christians not because of their place, or parents but because of their Faith.
False faiths are engineered by Satan, islam was created because of an "angel" appearing. That probably wasnt an angel
There doesn't seem to be consensus on that within Catholicism, some Popes have said that it's definitely a place of eternal punishment, others have said it's more like you describe.
I guess it's also up in the air what happens to unbaptized babies for Catholics. In that case the church seems to be going for a sorta quantum theory thing where the baby's soul is hopefully saved, but officially probably not (maybe to discourage the infanticide conundrum). They pretty much let you pick and choose what you want it to be, since they probably don't want to tell mothers who lost their baby during birth that it's going to hell.
Interesting. Considering that every other denomination and faith is indeed engineered by Satan, how did you go about confirming that Catholicism was the only true one? Did you examine Zoroastrianism, the proto-christianity, as well as non-abarahamic religions, before deciding? What made Catholicism the clear winner?
Unfortunately, this aspect is what makes cults and religions such a good comparison to ML, as both have that auto-correcting feature to automatically make the adherent dismiss any information that conflicts with their beliefs as false. In the case of ML, it is claimed to be CIA propaganda or false history. For religions, it is taught that the literal most evil spirit is behind virtually all contrary information.
That mechanism is extremely valuable to a priesthood/leader to retain their flock/followers, as it makes it almost impossible for someone outside of that belief system to show them information that would reveal it to be false.
In a world where there theoretically was one true religion, that same mechanism would also act to keep people in a false religion, as they would have to assume that any other religion is in fact the devil tempting them, even if that person tempting them was from the objectively true religion.
How do you know?
Yes. I did. I did a LOT of research, and I have experienced a lot of miracles in my life due to Catholicism.
And its not "all contrary information" it is false faiths. Doubts are good, they help you dive deeper into faith.
What sort of research did you do? What made Catholicism stand out from every other religion?
just looking at the inner values and beliefs of them I guess.
Catholicism stood out because God is all loving, and forgiving, and due to multiple miracles in my life and actual scientific evidence of miracles and proof
Do you have any specific examples of values and beliefs that you liked better than any of the other religions or christian denominations?
My protestant church said that too, and emphasized Jesus's forgiveness.
Could you share those? I've never seen any scientific evidence of miracles despite looking for it.
Ah... I'm sorry, but neither of those events would stand as proof in a scientific context.
In the first case, medical oddities occur quite frequently, and it's not unlikely that patient had an unusual form of cancer that was particularly receptive to the more primitive treatment at the time. I would not classify an unusual experience as a miracle, personally. I have seen many similar stories and claims from the alternative cancer cure community, all of which I have found to be grifting, yet to those less skeptical, seem quite convincing.
The second case is extremely dubious, as it is purely hearsay that the flesh suddenly appeared, and it would be quite easy to simply place the supposed flesh photographed and claim it morphed there naturally. Church officials are not immune to lying, corruption, or deceit as history shows, so without an unrelated 3rd party having been present and verifying in real-time, to me it seems clear that it's a stunt, as the evidence is about as convincing or trustworthy as the Loch Ness monster photograph.
the matter was tested, and it was heart tissue that had the WBCs alive, they usually die 2 hours after being removed from the body.
There are some pretty solid criticisms on how it was tested.
Speaking for myself, I would not personally take that test as adequate evidence of the supernatural.
this is basically
"they took pictures so yeah, yeah, they thought it was important so they couldnt debunk it"
and contamination risks are present, but to be honest WHO is cutting up a human heart and mixing it up with microbial growths and who has human cardiac tissue on their fingers?
and the WBCs were alive.
I really did not go into Protestantism as it removed 6 books from the Bible and branced off from thr one true Church
I see. How how did you determine that the Protestant's reasons for removing those books was illegitimate (as far as I can tell, they claim that the 6 additional books were not included in the original Hebrew canon, essentially saying that the catholic additions were not inspired works, and that they are closer to a more pure, unadulterated Bible), also how did Eastern Orthodoxy fare in the overall assessment?
Did it concern you at all that Catholicism once burned people at the stake for translating the Bible into English (which in practice would lessen the power the priesthood had in disseminating the Bible)?
Lastly, I'm quite curious how you then determined that an Abrahamic religion (Catholicism) was the only true religion, what set it apart from Taoism, Buddhism, Sikhism, etc, as the only source of spiritual truth for you?
removing ANY books from the Bible is illegitimate as stated so by Revelation. The original Bible was Catholic.
Eastern Orthodoxy is way more complicated, I can say it was for theological reasons I did not go into it.
The catholic emperor did that, not the Church and the Church does indeed have some bits of dark history.
As I said, scientific proof instead of vibes, and God being all loving. Buddhism preaches works instead of faith, but we still have original sin.
From what I understand, and as someone who once had an interest in ancient bibles, even ordering a re-print of scans of an original tyndale bible in Olde English, I don't believe it's quite so cut and dried. Biblical texts and the Dead Sea Scrolls were originally in Hebrew, and from modern archeology it appears that even then, there were multiple versions, with some differing greatly.
https://www.bibleodyssey.org/articles/what-are-the-earliest-versions-and-translations-of-the-bible/
The Catholic Church was the first sect of Christianity to add in those 7 books later, in their own Latin translation of the Bible..
Personally I must observe it is rather convenient that the books they added just so happened to contain material which bolstered their political power, wealth, and importance in society by requiring the Church as a necessary intermediary (besides it being in a language only they could read).
I'm not quite sure how that applies. The concept of original sin only exists in the abrahamic religions. When you were assessing the other religions, were you doing so under the assumption that Christianity's original sin was already a truism and determined the merit of the other religions based on how they applied to that concept? If so, how did you determine that Original Sin is by default, a scientific universal truth?
The Catholic Church is the original church, and the Pope holds the same authority as Peter.
And the Bible is just a bunch of books joined together.
Original Sin is true, that is fact. Take a look around the world. It will let you know.
And if 7 books are the problem, why remove 6?
Jesus literally handed Peter the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven.
Personally I would put forward that starting with that assumption is more gut-feeling/vibe based than science based, since our negative behaviors are able to be explained without the need for a supernatural answer.
I guess I'll conclude with an observation; I started with equating ML's to religious indoctrination since they have a sunk cost and interest only believing sources that reinforce their worldview despite solid evidence that is contrary to their views. I personally believe all dogmatic religions encourage that same phenomena, with the abrahamic religions and their offshoots being particularly stifling (though others such as Confucianism can be similarly bad), due to their direct encouragement of seeing any outside information as the devil's work.
As someone who believed those dogmas for a long time, I know that such teachings essentially give a perception of paranoia that any person who isn't in the same club is a potential source of evil or temptation into the mind, which results in automatically assuming all counter-information being dismissed or not properly investigated out of the discomfort it can create. I personally look back on those days as a very bleak and sad time due to that worldview, I hope you avoid it.
As all of the information presented was exclusively from biased pro-catholic sources, I'm sorry to say I remain unconvinced, just as I remain unconvinced by ML's for similar reasons. However, I want to say thank you for taking the time to explain how you came to these conclusions and views, I did find it enlightening.
I wish you the best.
May the Lord be with you, Frater.