this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
292 points (98.7% liked)
Not The Onion
21532 readers
703 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Are we sure this isn’t the onion? The article is worth a read, what a bunch of absolute gems!
No! Say it ain’t so! Rich dips being taxed as much as gasp the upper middle class??? and that’s nothing, now they want to tax your 70 million dollar jet? Thats not even the nice one! Why even own it anymore???? Taxes on property? I mean, you’re not even using it! How dare they tax it!
The author is so close! It’s not about politics, it’s about people realizing that the rich people are trash and are strangling the rest of us. So fuck your private jets, fuck your entitled ass for being outraged at having to pay taxes on your manhattan vacation home or whatever has you so worked up over the pied-à-terre tax. I hope you choke on the gold leaf you put on your bagels or whatever. If the masses get hungry enough, they are going to eat you.
Not really a surprise, the article was written by a CEO of a private jet company.
bro is just trying to sell charter flights to other rich fucks. it's an ad.
Shame of he ever had to get a job that didn't involve crawling for rich assholes.
If I have to pay taxes on my labor they can pay it on their luxuries. At least I'm doing something useful for this country.
Tbf, it could also be a little about airspace. Teterboro, JFK, and LaGuardia make for some of the busiest and most crowded airspace in the world. I'm sure ATC would love not having to deal with the extra headache of vectoring around planes with 200 people in them for the sake of some stuffy fuck in his private jet.
It's not about airspace at all. ATC (part of the FAA) isn't funded by airport landing/handling/ramp fees. Controllers wouldn't ever get any of this money, and they probably wouldn't care either way, other than that directionally less traffic probably means smaller federal budget allocations for ATC.
As things go, ATC is pretty egalitarian. If you fly up in hour homebuilt carbon cub, they'll give you the same respect and attention that they give Delta or JetBlue. Private jets don't get special treatment. If anything, ATC gives you favorable treatment for being knowledgeable, predictable, communicative, and not actin the fool.
And that's the whole point. Why should 10 private jets with total of 10 passengers get 10x more attention than a single airbus with 300 passengers?
The reason is that each of those private jets is a missile that, if not given appropriate attention, can run into any of the airliners. From an ATC POV, a plane is a plane - they all need to be kept separate. Some of them have different characteristics, to be sure. But they all have to be managed for the safety of everyone. Now, it could be a different argument as to whether you should allow private jets in really busy airspace. But if you let them in, you have to manage them, same as everyone else.