this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
85 points (96.7% liked)

Open Source

46923 readers
362 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i want to get back to logseq but … i wonder how it will work with my obsidian lib; it’s just dirs and files. with links. mostly just todo lists by project and some code snippets for reference.

is logseq compatible?

[–] INeedMana@piefed.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

In the past I migrated my notes from Obsidian to Logseq. Both have a bit different approach, but basically the move was to modify dir/file.md to be dir__file.md

[–] girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Logseq leverages centrally hosted databases while obsidian works directly from files and directory structures. There should be a way to import individual files but I'm not sure if it will parse your entire vault.

[–] sunstoned@lemmus.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] brisk@aussie.zone 0 points 13 hours ago

It's fine for input, but Logseq ".md" files are only suitable for import back into Logseq (at least if they have any links)

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

gotcha. thanks! i kinda like the idea that the place is just a series of md files, in obsidian to be honest but will give logseq another look!