this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
25 points (96.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39537 readers
929 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Could be in any context. I do it a little on UFC fights but that's a relatively low amount and I can afford I to lose any time I do. It seems like it's becoming a really wide spread problem though, at least in the US. At the same time I don't see why it should be illegal. Granted I also don't think any drug should be illegal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 9 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I don't do it because it feels like I'm throwing my money away.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Since I have a basic understanding of how odds work, I don't do it because it is throwing my money away.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Gambling with any company is going to be negative expected value. However, I feel the same way gambling with individuals where the expected value is zero.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Not necessarily with sports betting though: Then you have a legitimate possibility of being more well informed than the bookies. A casino is mathematically rigged such that you will lose over time, that doesn't apply to games of skill (sports).

I don't gamble myself, but I seem to remember reading that the average person actually makes a net win in football betting (that is, more than 50% of gamblers are winning). Apparently, the betting companies make it up because you have a relatively small fraction of people that are losing big, and losing consistently.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Unless I've got some insider information on specific athletes or I've done enough statistical analysis to gain a statistical analysis to gain an advantage over the house, I don't see myself getting positive expected value.

Also, it is in the interest of sports books for a rumor like that to propagate.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

it is in the interest of sports books for a rumor like that to propagate.

Oh, definitely. I'm not sure about this at all, please don't take it as fact.

I completely agree with you. My point is just that with sports betting the playing field is actually fair, in the sense that anything can happen and that the bookies and the betters are considering the odds based on the same publicly available information. That differs significantly from games where the house is mathematically guaranteed to win in the long term, while the gamblers are guaranteed to lose.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Except that the payout for those bets are generally done so that the house takes a cut of the overall action. The vig is baked into the payout for sport outcomes; betting on all the outcomes equally isn't going to probabilistically give you the payout equal to what you'd buy in.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

betting on all the outcomes equally isn’t going to probabilistically give you the payout equal to what you’d buy in.

Exactly. That's why I'm differentiating between games of skill (i.e. sports) and purely statistical "casino games". It's possible to beat the house in sports betting, but only if you are genuinely better than the house at considering the odds. Of course, the house will always try to set the odds in their own favour, but it's impossible for them to know the exact odds. Thus, a well informed player can, in principle, identify the games where the house has under-valued an outcome and exploit those.

This basically boils down to the fact that in a casino game, the probability of every possible outcome is known exactly, so the house can trivially set a payout that benefits them. In sports, it's impossible to know the exact probability of a given outcome, so the house can make mistakes.

[–] Wfh@lemmy.zip 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That's a common misconception. Sports gambling is exactly like casino games. Odds are skewed in exactly the same fashion in the house's favor, the payout is lower than the win probability. In the long run, the house always wins.

Also, as the industry relies heavily nowadays on trading where any event can alter the odds in real time, I guess the only way to cheat the system would be akin to insider trading.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics_of_bookmaking

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I think you're misunderstanding my point. You're completely right that the house sets the odds it it's own favour in order to make money, I'm not arguing against that.

My point is that setting odds in casino games like roulette is trivial, and there are no confounding elements that can suddenly make your odds wrong. In sports betting, setting the odds is highly non-trivial and pretty much impossible to do exactly. The better can look at the odds and consider whether they think the house has under-valued a certain game, which is possible, and bet on that. If the better is more well informed than the house, it's actually possible that they make a net win. That's completely different from a casino game, where the odds will never be in your favour.

I would argue that sports betting is a fair game, in the sense that the house sets odds, and you can consider whether those odds are in your favour or the house's favour. Obviously, they will try to always set them in their own favour, but (also obviously) they can make mistakes that are exploitable to a well informed better.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I agree if you're talking casino slots or pretty much any highly orginized "game" at a casino.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I do it a little on UFC fights

I agree if you’re talking casino slots

Now is your time to shine and become smarter.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world -1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I'm talking among friends usually only a hundred or two on big fights. I don't have or use any apps/books. Or sometimes 5-10 per fight if I have a few people over. I also haven't missed an event in years so my bets are pretty educated guesses lol. Again, this is money I can afford to lose and is just between buddies, it's still gambling/betting though.