love that the video in question shows how a script cannot be followed by AI (overlapping/converging voices). like even if this particular quirk is solved then it still won't be about the script. it will be about whoever can mangle the generator using whatever tools are available to create consistent plots and characters. whether or not your writing can even be represented as an AI generated movie will be decided by how the technology works.

it reminds me of the old machinimas. people are going to create endearing content, i'm sure, just like they did using video game engines. but this content will be restricted to whatever the AI is capable of. If the AI generated movie isn't about, in some way, AI generation itself, the medium instantly falls apart.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago

What I hate the most about AI video generation is that it's very good at all the wrong things while being so random and uncontrollable as to be functionally useless. It can literally only make janky vapid slop and every improvement it gets only makes the problem more pronounced because it becomes more detailed and less glaring-error-prone without fixing the core problems that make it useless.

And the short in that post is like the ideal scenario for covering up those flaws, too: non-human characters with busy but uniform details no one can really pay too close attention to, that are always viewed from the front, and that remain in place while making overly exaggerated movements. And it still looks like ass with noticeable errors that literally cannot be corrected since the "creator" is just pulling a gacha lever over and over.

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago

The bad animation can also be solved by hiring good animators